PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLQ vs. SVTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLQ vs. SVTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SVTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLQ achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly higher than SVTAX's 3.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GLQ has outperformed SVTAX with an annualized return of 9.59%, while SVTAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.24% annualized return.


GLQ

1D
-0.35%
1M
7.73%
YTD
17.97%
6M
17.46%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
26.55%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
9.59%

SVTAX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.83%
YTD
3.33%
6M
4.11%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
7.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLQ vs. SVTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLQ
Clough Global Equity Fund
17.97%28.55%25.41%2.67%-42.31%6.48%28.28%23.94%-9.74%32.83%
SVTAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund
3.33%13.44%12.77%7.77%-7.80%18.18%-2.68%19.81%-6.47%17.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GLQ and SVTAX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2006

0.60

The correlation between GLQ and SVTAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLQ vs. SVTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLQ
GLQ Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SVTAX
SVTAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SVTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SVTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLQ vs. SVTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SVTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLQSVTAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.86

0.86

+2.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.86

1.28

+2.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.15

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

1.03

+2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.74

3.24

+12.50

GLQ vs. SVTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the SVTAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLQ and SVTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLQSVTAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

0.86

+2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.69

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.59

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.50

-0.21

Drawdowns

GLQ vs. SVTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLQ drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than SVTAX's maximum drawdown of -43.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLQ and SVTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLQSVTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.45%

-43.81%

-20.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.61%

-5.99%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-10.37%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.47%

-16.52%

-40.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.47%

-31.02%

-26.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-2.86%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.30%

-8.06%

-9.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

1.91%

+0.67%

Volatility

GLQ vs. SVTAX - Volatility Comparison

Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SVTAX) at 1.66%. This indicates that GLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLQSVTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

1.66%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.37%

5.10%

+6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

7.21%

+7.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

10.61%

+9.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.99%

12.28%

+9.71%

GLQ vs. SVTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SVTAX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLQ vs. SVTAX - Dividend Comparison

GLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, more than SVTAX's 8.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLQ
Clough Global Equity Fund
9.48%10.18%10.86%12.13%21.42%12.25%9.66%10.96%13.68%9.63%11.68%11.01%
SVTAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund
8.48%8.77%8.68%5.76%10.62%11.81%1.00%5.39%10.70%7.90%5.97%6.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLQ and SVTAX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLQ has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to SVTAX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLQ dropped -64.45% vs SVTAX's -43.81%.

GLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLQ and SVTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer