GLPIX vs. SRV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GLPIX (Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund) and SRV (NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GLPIX returned 8.39%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for SRV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLPIX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SRV.

Performance

GLPIX vs. SRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLPIX achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly lower than SRV's 34.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GLPIX has underperformed SRV with an annualized return of 8.39%, while SRV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.

GLPIX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: 17.17%
• 6M: 17.20%
• 1Y: 18.60%
• 3Y*: 22.66%
• 5Y*: 18.34%
• 10Y*: 8.39%

SRV

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 34.33%
• 6M: 37.01%
• 1Y: 43.63%
• 3Y*: 29.97%
• 5Y*: 26.54%
• 10Y*: 12.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLPIX vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund	17.17%	4.45%	28.00%	19.67%	26.06%	39.89%	-31.08%	7.04%	-14.57%	-5.13%
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund	34.33%	5.05%	50.70%	19.88%	20.11%	50.45%	-41.65%	33.99%	-21.61%	-4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GLPIX and SRV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between GLPIX and SRV has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GLPIX vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLPIX

GLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
GLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
GLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

SRV

SRV Risk / Return Rank: 64
SRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SRV Omega Ratio Rank: 63
SRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
SRV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLPIX vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLPIX	SRV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.27	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	2.88	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.40	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	3.34	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.78	9.49	-1.71

GLPIX vs. SRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the SRV Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLPIX and SRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLPIX vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLPIX drawdown since its inception was -75.98%, smaller than the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPIX and SRV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLPIX	SRV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.98%	-92.97%	+16.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.87%	-13.13%	+6.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.96%	-26.26%	+12.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.89%	-26.26%	+5.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.48%	-81.70%	+11.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.73%	-6.29%	+1.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.05%	-48.64%	+25.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	4.61%	-2.15%

Volatility

GLPIX vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) is 4.53%, while NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that GLPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLPIX	SRV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	7.60%	-3.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.71%	15.83%	-7.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.63%	19.35%	-7.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.98%	26.45%	-7.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.86%	38.30%	-12.44%

GLPIX vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLPIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLPIX vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison

GLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, less than SRV's 15.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund	6.39%	7.03%	6.60%	6.70%	6.00%	6.26%	9.72%	8.67%	8.02%	7.49%	11.46%	6.62%
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund	15.38%	19.31%	12.85%	15.56%	8.85%	4.72%	12.05%	10.59%	12.73%	9.07%	7.95%	11.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLPIX and SRV in my portfolio?

GLPIX and SRV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLPIX or SRV?

SRV has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to GLPIX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLPIX dropped -75.98% vs SRV's -92.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.