GLPIX vs. MLPA
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA).
GLPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 27, 2013. MLPA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2012.
Performance
GLPIX vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLPIX vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.94% | 4.45% | 28.00% | 19.67% | 26.06% | 39.89% | -31.08% | 7.04% | -14.57% | -5.13% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 13.45% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 27.03% | 39.64% | -33.97% | 11.91% | -15.71% | -8.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLPIX achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than MLPA's 13.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GLPIX has outperformed MLPA with an annualized return of 10.37%, while MLPA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.
GLPIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
MLPA
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLPIX vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLPIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPA's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLPIX vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank
GLPIX
MLPA
GLPIX vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLPIX | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.59 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 0.86 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.12 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.63 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.41 | 1.56 | +0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLPIX | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.59 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 1.02 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.30 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.16 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLPIX and MLPA is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLPIX vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison
GLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, less than MLPA's 7.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.21% | 7.03% | 6.60% | 6.70% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 9.72% | 8.67% | 8.02% | 7.49% | 11.46% | 6.62% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.15% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
Drawdowns
GLPIX vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLPIX drawdown since its inception was -75.98%, roughly equal to the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPIX and MLPA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLPIX | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.98% | -78.75% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -14.20% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -18.75% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.48% | -74.05% | +3.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -2.87% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.44% | -20.50% | -2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 5.73% | -0.32% |
Volatility
GLPIX vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) is 3.17%, while Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that GLPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLPIX | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 3.34% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 7.92% | -0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 16.09% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 18.41% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 27.64% | -1.55% |