GLPIX vs. GSRAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX).
GLPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 27, 2013. GSRAX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 23, 2004.
Performance
GLPIX vs. GSRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLPIX vs. GSRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.94% | 4.45% | 28.00% | 19.67% | 26.06% | 39.89% | -31.08% | 7.04% | -14.57% | -5.13% |
GSRAX Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund | -1.37% | 6.66% | 26.07% | 17.49% | -7.78% | 31.47% | 8.75% | 25.63% | -6.65% | 17.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLPIX achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than GSRAX's -1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, GLPIX has underperformed GSRAX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while GSRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.
GLPIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
GSRAX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- YTD
- -1.37%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 6.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLPIX vs. GSRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLPIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GSRAX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLPIX vs. GSRAX — Risk / Return Rank
GLPIX
GSRAX
GLPIX vs. GSRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLPIX | GSRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.44 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 0.75 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.11 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.40 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.41 | 1.84 | +0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLPIX | GSRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.44 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 0.56 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.58 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.46 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLPIX and GSRAX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GLPIX vs. GSRAX - Dividend Comparison
GLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, less than GSRAX's 12.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.21% | 7.03% | 6.60% | 6.70% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 9.72% | 8.67% | 8.02% | 7.49% | 11.46% | 6.62% |
GSRAX Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund | 12.83% | 12.17% | 25.88% | 9.60% | 14.01% | 11.55% | 4.39% | 11.85% | 97.89% | 21.56% | 3.16% | 0.92% |
Drawdowns
GLPIX vs. GSRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLPIX drawdown since its inception was -75.98%, which is greater than GSRAX's maximum drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPIX and GSRAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLPIX | GSRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.98% | -44.40% | -31.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -12.84% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -25.43% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.48% | -38.97% | -31.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -9.35% | +8.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.44% | -6.10% | -17.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 2.87% | +2.54% |
Volatility
GLPIX vs. GSRAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) is 3.17%, while Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that GLPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLPIX | GSRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 3.97% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 8.75% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 17.30% | -1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 20.22% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 19.85% | +6.24% |