PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLPI vs. LOAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GLPI vs. LOAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLPI achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than LOAN's -2.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GLPI has outperformed LOAN with an annualized return of 9.52%, while LOAN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.87% annualized return.


GLPI

1D
-0.90%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
2.25%
6M
1.64%
1Y
1.35%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
9.52%

LOAN

1D
0.91%
1M
5.74%
YTD
-2.72%
6M
-6.13%
1Y
-7.67%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
-1.27%
10Y*
6.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLPI vs. LOAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLPI
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
2.25%-0.80%3.95%0.92%13.49%22.10%4.18%42.88%-5.89%29.78%
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
-2.72%-9.37%22.47%2.12%5.67%13.92%-10.36%21.90%1.46%-16.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GLPI and LOAN is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2013

0.09

Fundamentals

EPS

GLPI:

$4.24

LOAN:

$0.44

PE Ratio

GLPI:

10.42

LOAN:

10.08

PEG Ratio

GLPI:

1.49

LOAN:

5.22

PS Ratio

GLPI:

5.97

LOAN:

5.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLPI:

$1.56B

LOAN:

$8.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLPI:

$608.86M

LOAN:

$6.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

GLPI:

$1.60B

LOAN:

$5.02M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLPI vs. LOAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLPI
GLPI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GLPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

LOAN
LOAN Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LOAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOAN Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
LOAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOAN Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLPI vs. LOAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLPILOANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.96

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

-0.35

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

-0.54

+0.81

GLPI vs. LOAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLPI Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the LOAN Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLPI and LOAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLPI vs. LOAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLPI drawdown since its inception was -69.44%, smaller than the maximum LOAN drawdown of -90.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPI and LOAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLPILOANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.44%

-90.93%

+21.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-22.10%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-22.22%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.12%

-32.59%

+15.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.44%

-59.16%

-10.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.28%

-17.02%

+8.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-46.41%

+38.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

14.19%

-9.10%

Volatility

GLPI vs. LOAN - Volatility Comparison

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) at 4.15%. This indicates that GLPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLPILOANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

4.15%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.63%

13.81%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

21.72%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.86%

26.05%

-6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.85%

34.39%

-5.54%

Dividends

GLPI vs. LOAN - Dividend Comparison

GLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, less than LOAN's 10.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLPI
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
7.15%6.94%6.31%6.38%5.38%5.96%5.33%6.36%7.95%6.76%7.58%7.84%
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
10.29%9.89%8.21%9.05%9.38%8.82%8.06%7.55%8.54%6.97%4.93%9.68%

Financials

GLPI vs. LOAN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
356.52M
2.07M
(GLPI) Total Revenue
(LOAN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GLPI vs. LOAN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
82.4%
Portfolio components
GLPI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 356.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LOAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.70M and revenue of 2.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.4%.

GLPI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 333.35M and revenue of 356.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 93.5%.

LOAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27M and revenue of 2.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.

GLPI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 231.83M and revenue of 356.52M, resulting in a net margin of 65.0%.

LOAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported a net income of 1.27M and revenue of 2.07M, resulting in a net margin of 61.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLPI and LOAN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLPI has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to LOAN (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLPI dropped -69.44% vs LOAN's -90.93%.

GLPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLPI and LOAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer