GLPI vs. PSA

In the year-to-date period, GLPI achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than PSA's 12.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GLPI has outperformed PSA with an annualized return of 11.51%, while PSA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and Public Storage (PSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GLPI Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the PSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLPI and PSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than PSA's 3.59% yield.

The maximum GLPI drawdown since its inception was -69.44%, which is greater than PSA's maximum drawdown of -55.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPI and PSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) is 5.60%, while Public Storage (PSA) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that GLPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and Public Storage. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.