PortfoliosLab logo
GLPI vs. PSA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GLPI and PSA is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GLPI vs. PSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and Public Storage (PSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLPI:

0.59

PSA:

0.51

Sortino Ratio

GLPI:

1.07

PSA:

1.02

Omega Ratio

GLPI:

1.13

PSA:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

GLPI:

0.91

PSA:

0.50

Martin Ratio

GLPI:

3.23

PSA:

1.25

Ulcer Index

GLPI:

3.99%

PSA:

11.86%

Daily Std Dev

GLPI:

18.53%

PSA:

23.68%

Max Drawdown

GLPI:

-69.44%

PSA:

-55.80%

Current Drawdown

GLPI:

-6.87%

PSA:

-14.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLPI:

$12.89B

PSA:

$53.50B

EPS

GLPI:

$2.89

PSA:

$10.08

PE Ratio

GLPI:

16.22

PSA:

30.26

PEG Ratio

GLPI:

8.08

PSA:

11.83

PS Ratio

GLPI:

8.31

PSA:

11.29

PB Ratio

GLPI:

3.06

PSA:

10.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLPI:

$1.55B

PSA:

$4.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLPI:

$1.44B

PSA:

$3.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

GLPI:

$1.42B

PSA:

$3.37B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLPI achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than PSA's 4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GLPI has outperformed PSA with an annualized return of 9.36%, while PSA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.77% annualized return.


GLPI

YTD

0.40%

1M

-2.96%

6M

-0.23%

1Y

10.91%

5Y*

18.57%

10Y*

9.36%

PSA

YTD

4.27%

1M

6.96%

6M

-5.92%

1Y

11.96%

5Y*

16.82%

10Y*

8.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLPI vs. PSA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLPI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLPI is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLPI is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLPI is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLPI is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLPI is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLPI is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

PSA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PSA is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PSA is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PSA is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PSA is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PSA is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PSA is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLPI vs. PSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and Public Storage (PSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GLPI Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the PSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLPI and PSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GLPI vs. PSA - Dividend Comparison

GLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than PSA's 3.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GLPI
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
6.39%6.31%6.38%5.38%5.96%3.63%6.36%7.95%6.76%7.58%7.84%48.81%
PSA
Public Storage
3.88%4.01%3.93%7.55%2.14%3.46%3.76%3.95%3.83%3.27%2.62%3.03%

Drawdowns

GLPI vs. PSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLPI drawdown since its inception was -69.44%, which is greater than PSA's maximum drawdown of -55.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPI and PSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GLPI vs. PSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) is 5.50%, while Public Storage (PSA) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that GLPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GLPI vs. PSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and Public Storage. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
395.24M
1.18B
(GLPI) Total Revenue
(PSA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GLPI vs. PSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and Public Storage over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
96.6%
72.0%
(GLPI) Gross Margin
(PSA) Gross Margin
GLPI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 381.68M and revenue of 395.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.6%.

PSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Public Storage reported a gross profit of 851.34M and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.0%.

GLPI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 258.83M and revenue of 395.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 65.5%.

PSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Public Storage reported an operating income of 543.44M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

GLPI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 165.18M and revenue of 395.24M, resulting in a net margin of 41.8%.

PSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Public Storage reported a net income of 407.79M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 34.5%.