GLP vs. IAU
GLP (Global Partners LP) is a stock, while IAU (iShares Gold Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Over the past 10 years, GLP returned 25.43%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for IAU. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLP vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLP achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, GLP has outperformed IAU with an annualized return of 25.43%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively lower 13.31% annualized return.
GLP
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- 1Y
- -4.25%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.36%
- 10Y*
- 25.43%
IAU
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
GLP vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLP Global Partners LP | 19.55% | -4.39% | 17.27% | 35.29% | 61.23% | 60.17% | -6.40% | 37.24% | 8.06% | -5.21% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 2.98% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLP and IAU is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2005 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLP vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
GLP
IAU
GLP vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Partners LP (GLP) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLP | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.24 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 1.69 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 4.19 | -4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLP | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 1.23 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 1.03 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.62 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
GLP vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLP drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLP and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLP | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.18% | -45.14% | -36.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.22% | -19.18% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.60% | -19.18% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.80% | -20.93% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.57% | -21.82% | -40.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.27% | -17.70% | +5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.02% | -15.96% | -8.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.91% | 7.71% | +6.20% |
Volatility
GLP vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
Global Partners LP (GLP) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 5.50%. This indicates that GLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLP | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 5.50% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.58% | 23.02% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.21% | 26.42% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.82% | 17.95% | +17.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.98% | 15.90% | +22.08% |
Dividends
GLP vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
GLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLP Global Partners LP | 6.25% | 7.14% | 6.14% | 8.48% | 6.93% | 12.28% | 11.30% | 10.14% | 11.50% | 11.08% | 9.51% | 15.57% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLP and IAU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLP has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to IAU (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLP dropped -81.18% vs IAU's -45.14%.
IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLP and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer