GLP vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Global Partners LP (GLP) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLP or GIS.
Correlation
The correlation between GLP and GIS is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GLP vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLP:
0.84
GIS:
-0.10
GLP:
1.32
GIS:
-0.01
GLP:
1.16
GIS:
1.00
GLP:
1.26
GIS:
-0.06
GLP:
3.04
GIS:
-0.25
GLP:
10.00%
GIS:
7.77%
GLP:
36.24%
GIS:
18.99%
GLP:
-81.17%
GIS:
-45.08%
GLP:
-7.36%
GIS:
-29.90%
Fundamentals
GLP:
$1.78B
GIS:
$32.87B
GLP:
$3.34
GIS:
$4.64
GLP:
15.83
GIS:
12.85
GLP:
-0.62
GIS:
3.50
GLP:
$17.11B
GIS:
$19.90B
GLP:
$535.31M
GIS:
$6.95B
GLP:
$294.79M
GIS:
$4.08B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLP achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GLP has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 14.83%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.40% annualized return.
GLP
13.56%
10.42%
31.95%
28.60%
34.64%
14.83%
GIS
-5.52%
-5.29%
-5.95%
-2.04%
5.42%
4.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLP vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLP
GIS
GLP vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Partners LP (GLP) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLP vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
GLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than GIS's 4.01% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLP Global Partners LP | 5.41% | 6.14% | 9.92% | 6.93% | 9.68% | 11.30% | 10.14% | 11.51% | 11.09% | 9.52% | 15.57% | 7.67% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 4.01% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% |
Drawdowns
GLP vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLP drawdown since its inception was -81.17%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLP and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLP vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Global Partners LP (GLP) has a higher volatility of 13.63% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.48%. This indicates that GLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GLP vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Partners LP and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities