PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLP vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GLPGIS
YTD Return23.29%3.77%
1Y Return57.59%3.75%
3Y Return (Ann)41.55%4.28%
5Y Return (Ann)31.70%7.88%
10Y Return (Ann)12.26%6.07%
Sharpe Ratio1.790.20
Sortino Ratio2.320.40
Omega Ratio1.301.05
Calmar Ratio2.550.13
Martin Ratio6.980.71
Ulcer Index8.80%5.29%
Daily Std Dev34.36%18.99%
Max Drawdown-81.17%-45.08%
Current Drawdown-0.67%-24.10%

Fundamentals


GLPGIS
Market Cap$1.64B$35.67B
EPS$3.31$4.20
PE Ratio14.6915.30
PEG Ratio-0.623.27
Total Revenue (TTM)$17.39B$19.80B
Gross Profit (TTM)$694.91M$6.78B
EBITDA (TTM)$370.82M$4.19B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between GLP and GIS is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GLP vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GLP achieves a 23.29% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's 3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GLP has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 12.26%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower 6.07% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.38%
-4.89%
GLP
GIS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLP vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Partners LP (GLP) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLP, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLP, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.32
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLP, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLP, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLP, currently valued at 6.98, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.98
GIS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.40
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GIS, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.71

GLP vs. GIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLP and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.79
0.20
GLP
GIS

Dividends

GLP vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

GLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than GIS's 3.65% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GLP
Global Partners LP
5.84%9.92%6.93%9.68%11.30%10.14%11.51%11.09%9.52%15.57%7.67%6.61%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
3.65%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%2.85%

Drawdowns

GLP vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLP drawdown since its inception was -81.17%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLP and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.67%
-24.10%
GLP
GIS

Volatility

GLP vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Global Partners LP (GLP) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 5.09%. This indicates that GLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.79%
5.09%
GLP
GIS

Financials

GLP vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Partners LP and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items