PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLP vs. GIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

GLP vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Partners LP (GLP) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLP vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLP
Global Partners LP
2.25%-4.39%17.27%35.29%61.23%60.17%-6.40%37.24%8.06%-5.21%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
-18.83%-23.75%1.45%-19.97%28.09%18.53%13.60%43.13%-31.57%-0.65%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLP:

$1.44B

GIS:

$20.19B

EPS

GLP:

$2.40

GIS:

$4.07

PE Ratio

GLP:

17.55

GIS:

9.15

PEG Ratio

GLP:

0.20

GIS:

3.94

PS Ratio

GLP:

0.08

GIS:

1.10

PB Ratio

GLP:

2.13

GIS:

2.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLP:

$18.56B

GIS:

$18.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLP:

$1.06B

GIS:

$4.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

GLP:

$343.47M

GIS:

$3.03B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLP achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -18.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GLP has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 23.83%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -1.97% annualized return.


GLP

1D
-0.71%
1M
-10.39%
YTD
2.25%
6M
-9.22%
1Y
-15.83%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
23.88%
10Y*
23.83%

GIS

1D
0.30%
1M
-17.71%
YTD
-18.83%
6M
-24.20%
1Y
-34.63%
3Y*
-21.16%
5Y*
-6.10%
10Y*
-1.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLP vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLP
GLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLP Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
GIS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLP vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Partners LP (GLP) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLPGISDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.49

-1.46

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.50

-2.13

+1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.75

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

-0.89

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.23

-1.82

+0.59

GLP vs. GIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLP Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLP and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLPGISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

-1.46

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

-0.29

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

-0.09

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.43

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between GLP and GIS is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GLP vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

GLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than GIS's 6.53% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLP
Global Partners LP
7.15%7.14%6.14%8.48%6.93%12.28%11.30%10.14%11.50%11.08%9.51%15.57%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
6.53%5.20%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%

Drawdowns

GLP vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLP drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -55.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLP and GIS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLPGISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.18%

-55.55%

-25.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.22%

-37.97%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.80%

-55.55%

+23.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.57%

-55.55%

-7.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.97%

-54.07%

+29.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-10.06%

-14.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.70%

18.65%

-4.95%

Volatility

GLP vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Global Partners LP (GLP) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS) have volatilities of 7.53% and 7.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLPGISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

7.33%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.36%

18.36%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.52%

23.79%

+8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.05%

20.89%

+15.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.20%

21.97%

+16.23%

Financials

GLP vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Partners LP and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B5.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
4.65B
4.44B
(GLP) Total Revenue
(GIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GLP vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Global Partners LP and General Mills, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
8.7%
0
Portfolio components
GLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Partners LP reported a gross profit of 403.72M and revenue of 4.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.7%.

GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Partners LP reported an operating income of 57.30M and revenue of 4.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

GLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Partners LP reported a net income of 18.34M and revenue of 4.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.