PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLP vs. MPLX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GLPMPLX
YTD Return22.53%36.15%
1Y Return63.03%41.67%
3Y Return (Ann)42.70%24.94%
5Y Return (Ann)32.06%25.76%
10Y Return (Ann)12.40%4.60%
Sharpe Ratio1.883.39
Sortino Ratio2.424.87
Omega Ratio1.311.60
Calmar Ratio2.694.34
Martin Ratio7.3623.57
Ulcer Index8.80%1.75%
Daily Std Dev34.38%12.17%
Max Drawdown-81.17%-85.72%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.25%

Fundamentals


GLPMPLX
Market Cap$1.64B$46.84B
EPS$3.31$4.24
PE Ratio14.6910.84
PEG Ratio-0.622.21
Total Revenue (TTM)$21.52B$11.11B
Gross Profit (TTM)$694.91M$6.30B
EBITDA (TTM)$370.82M$5.88B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between GLP and MPLX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GLP vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GLP achieves a 22.53% return, which is significantly lower than MPLX's 36.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GLP has outperformed MPLX with an annualized return of 12.40%, while MPLX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.60% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


250.00%300.00%350.00%400.00%450.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
464.91%
311.84%
GLP
MPLX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLP vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Partners LP (GLP) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLP, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLP, currently valued at 2.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLP, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLP, currently valued at 2.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLP, currently valued at 7.36, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.36
MPLX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MPLX, currently valued at 3.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MPLX, currently valued at 4.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MPLX, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.60
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MPLX, currently valued at 4.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MPLX, currently valued at 23.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0023.57

GLP vs. MPLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the MPLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLP and MPLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.88
3.39
GLP
MPLX

Dividends

GLP vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison

GLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than MPLX's 7.63% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GLP
Global Partners LP
5.88%9.92%6.93%9.68%11.30%10.14%11.51%11.09%9.52%15.57%7.67%6.61%
MPLX
MPLX LP
7.63%8.65%8.80%11.30%12.71%10.42%8.22%6.23%5.86%4.33%1.83%2.32%

Drawdowns

GLP vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLP drawdown since its inception was -81.17%, smaller than the maximum MPLX drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLP and MPLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.25%
GLP
MPLX

Volatility

GLP vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison

Global Partners LP (GLP) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to MPLX LP (MPLX) at 4.54%. This indicates that GLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.02%
4.54%
GLP
MPLX

Financials

GLP vs. MPLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Partners LP and MPLX LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items