GLP vs. MPLX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global Partners LP (GLP) and MPLX LP (MPLX).

Performance

GLP vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Partners LP (GLP) and MPLX LP (MPLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLP vs. MPLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLP Global Partners LP	2.25%	-4.39%	17.27%	35.29%	61.23%	60.17%	-6.40%	37.24%	8.06%	-5.21%
MPLX MPLX LP	9.03%	20.54%	41.72%	22.46%	21.09%	53.92%	-1.79%	-8.25%	-8.43%	9.00%

Fundamentals

EPS GLP : $2.40 MPLX : $7.24
PE Ratio GLP : 17.55 MPLX : 7.88
PEG Ratio GLP : 0.20 MPLX : 0.14
PS Ratio GLP : 0.08 MPLX : 2.98
Total Revenue (TTM) GLP : $18.56B MPLX : $13.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) GLP : $1.06B MPLX : $4.69B
EBITDA (TTM) GLP : $343.47M MPLX : $6.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLP achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than MPLX's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GLP has outperformed MPLX with an annualized return of 23.83%, while MPLX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.19% annualized return.

GLP

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -10.39%
• YTD: 2.25%
• 6M: -9.22%
• 1Y: -15.83%
• 3Y*: 18.58%
• 5Y*: 23.88%
• 10Y*: 23.83%

MPLX

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 18.98%
• 1Y: 15.36%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 27.90%
• 10Y*: 17.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GLP vs. MPLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLP

GLP Risk / Return Rank: 20
GLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
GLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
GLP Omega Ratio Rank: 20
GLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
GLP Martin Ratio Rank: 18

MPLX

MPLX Risk / Return Rank: 66
MPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLP vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Partners LP (GLP) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLP	MPLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	0.82	-1.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	1.19	-1.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.16	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	1.07	-1.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	3.80	-5.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLP vs. MPLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLP Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the MPLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLP and MPLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLP	MPLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.49	0.82	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	1.44	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.56	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.39	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between GLP and MPLX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GLP vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison

GLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, which matches MPLX's 7.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLP Global Partners LP	7.15%	7.14%	6.14%	8.48%	6.93%	12.28%	11.30%	10.14%	11.50%	11.08%	9.51%	15.57%
MPLX MPLX LP	7.12%	7.39%	7.33%	8.65%	8.80%	11.30%	12.70%	10.41%	8.22%	6.23%	5.86%	4.33%

Drawdowns

GLP vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLP drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, smaller than the maximum MPLX drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLP and MPLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLP	MPLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.18%	-85.72%	+4.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.22%	-13.38%	-13.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.80%	-18.46%	-13.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.57%	-75.21%	+12.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.97%	-3.55%	-21.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.10%	-30.33%	+6.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.70%	3.75%	+9.95%

Volatility

GLP vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison

Global Partners LP (GLP) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to MPLX LP (MPLX) at 3.97%. This indicates that GLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLP	MPLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.53%	3.97%	+3.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.36%	11.15%	+9.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.52%	18.89%	+13.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.05%	19.54%	+16.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.20%	30.91%	+7.29%

Financials

GLP vs. MPLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Global Partners LP and MPLX LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Partners LP reported a gross profit of 403.72M and revenue of 4.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.7%.

MPLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Partners LP reported an operating income of 57.30M and revenue of 4.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.

MPLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported an operating income of 1.48B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.0%.

GLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Partners LP reported a net income of 18.34M and revenue of 4.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.

MPLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 32.5%.