PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLNK vs. GXRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLNK vs. GXRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLNK having a -41.16% return and GXRP slightly lower at -42.34%.


GLNK

1D
-4.61%
1M
-23.60%
YTD
-41.16%
6M
-40.59%
1Y
-64.29%
3Y*
-13.05%
5Y*
10Y*

GXRP

1D
-4.30%
1M
-21.08%
YTD
-42.34%
6M
-42.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLNK vs. GXRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GLNK
Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF
-41.16%-28.00%
GXRP
Grayscale XRP Trust ETF
-42.34%-11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GLNK and GXRP is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLNK vs. GXRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLNK
GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GXRP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLNK vs. GXRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLNKGXRPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

GLNK vs. GXRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLNK vs. GXRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNK drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, which is greater than GXRP's maximum drawdown of -54.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNK and GXRP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLNKGXRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.22%

-54.45%

-41.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.22%

-54.45%

-41.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.20%

-31.90%

-24.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

69.80%

Volatility

GLNK vs. GXRP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLNKGXRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.93%

73.51%

+34.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

163.91%

73.51%

+90.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

163.91%

73.51%

+90.40%

GLNK vs. GXRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLNK has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GXRP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLNK vs. GXRP - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLNK nor GXRP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GLNK and GXRP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXRP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXRP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.

GLNK and GXRP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK), while GXRP tracks CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for GLNK and 0.35% for GXRP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLNK and GXRP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer