GLNG vs. FTI
GLNG (Golar LNG Limited) and FTI (TechnipFMC plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — GLNG in Oil & Gas Midstream, FTI in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services. Over the past 10 years, GLNG returned 13.18%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for FTI. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GLNG vs. FTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLNG achieves a 33.46% return, which is significantly lower than FTI's 61.05% return. Over the past 10 years, GLNG has underperformed FTI with an annualized return of 13.18%, while FTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.
GLNG
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 22.35%
- YTD
- 33.46%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 31.11%
- 5Y*
- 37.41%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.39%
FTI
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 7.36%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- YTD
- 61.05%
- 1Y
- 103.71%
- 3Y*
- 59.85%
- 5Y*
- 58.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $254.67M | $262.31M | $331.74M | |
| $83.99M | $61.94M | $73.87M |
GLNG vs. FTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLNG Golar LNG Limited | 33.46% | -9.74% | 90.78% | 4.39% | 83.94% | 28.53% | -32.21% | -33.64% | -25.94% | 31.03% |
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 61.05% | 54.90% | 44.78% | 66.07% | 105.91% | -15.36% | -55.23% | 12.09% | -36.32% | -11.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLNG and FTI is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2003 | 0.44 |
The correlation between GLNG and FTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GLNG:
$5.00B
FTI:
$28.57B
GLNG:
$1.29
FTI:
$2.86
GLNG:
38.07
FTI:
25.03
GLNG:
1.22
FTI:
0.03
GLNG:
11.46
FTI:
2.83
GLNG:
3.19
FTI:
8.91
GLNG:
$468.57M
FTI:
$10.40B
GLNG:
$245.50M
FTI:
$3.10B
GLNG:
$256.69M
FTI:
$1.86B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLNG vs. FTI — Risk / Return Rank
GLNG
FTI
GLNG vs. FTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLNG | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.48 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 5.98 | -4.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 17.23 | -15.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLNG vs. FTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLNG drawdown since its inception was -92.81%, roughly equal to the maximum FTI drawdown of -91.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNG and FTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLNG | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.81% | -91.74% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.95% | -16.44% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.41% | -28.94% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.35% | -36.71% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.29% | -85.71% | -0.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.07% | -6.86% | -8.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.58% | -33.78% | -9.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.02% | 5.74% | +5.28% |
Volatility
GLNG vs. FTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is 6.94%, while TechnipFMC plc (FTI) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that GLNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLNG | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 10.26% | -3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.41% | 23.71% | -2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.52% | 31.03% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.66% | 41.90% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.78% | 47.67% | +5.11% |
Dividends
GLNG vs. FTI - Dividend Comparison
GLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than FTI's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 0.28% | 0.45% | 0.69% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLNG Golar LNG Limited | 2.03% | 2.69% | 2.36% | 3.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.11% | 1.72% | 0.67% | 0.87% | 11.40% |
Financials
GLNG vs. FTI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Golar LNG Limited and TechnipFMC plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GLNG vs. FTI - Profitability Comparison
GLNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported a gross profit of 82.52M and revenue of 137.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.0%.
FTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.40B and revenue of 2.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.
GLNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported an operating income of 67.16M and revenue of 137.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.8%.
FTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 484.70M and revenue of 2.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.
GLNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported a net income of 83.58M and revenue of 137.55M, resulting in a net margin of 60.8%.
FTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 362.70M and revenue of 2.76B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLNG and FTI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTI has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to GLNG (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLNG dropped -92.81% vs FTI's -91.74%.
FTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLNG and FTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer