PortfoliosLab logo
GLNG vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GLNG and LNG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GLNG vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLNG:

1.21

LNG:

1.66

Sortino Ratio

GLNG:

1.88

LNG:

2.13

Omega Ratio

GLNG:

1.24

LNG:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

GLNG:

0.87

LNG:

2.20

Martin Ratio

GLNG:

5.55

LNG:

6.92

Ulcer Index

GLNG:

9.25%

LNG:

7.00%

Daily Std Dev

GLNG:

42.88%

LNG:

29.25%

Max Drawdown

GLNG:

-92.81%

LNG:

-97.84%

Current Drawdown

GLNG:

-36.24%

LNG:

-8.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLNG:

$3.97B

LNG:

$51.35B

EPS

GLNG:

$0.48

LNG:

$13.63

PE Ratio

GLNG:

79.06

LNG:

16.91

PEG Ratio

GLNG:

0.02

LNG:

2.09

PS Ratio

GLNG:

15.25

LNG:

3.07

PB Ratio

GLNG:

1.97

LNG:

9.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLNG:

$195.41M

LNG:

$16.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLNG:

$69.19M

LNG:

$8.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

GLNG:

$74.99M

LNG:

$6.53B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLNG achieves a -9.60% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GLNG has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of -0.69%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.


GLNG

YTD

-9.60%

1M

1.82%

6M

1.09%

1Y

51.33%

5Y*

48.07%

10Y*

-0.69%

LNG

YTD

7.74%

1M

4.84%

6M

7.73%

1Y

48.11%

5Y*

42.93%

10Y*

12.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLNG vs. LNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLNG is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLNG is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLNG is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLNG is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLNG is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLNG is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLNG vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GLNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLNG and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GLNG vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

GLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than LNG's 0.84% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GLNG
Golar LNG Limited
2.64%2.36%3.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.11%1.72%0.67%0.87%11.40%4.94%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.84%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GLNG vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNG drawdown since its inception was -92.81%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNG and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GLNG vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) has a higher volatility of 15.08% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 8.40%. This indicates that GLNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GLNG vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Golar LNG Limited and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
65.92M
5.44B
(GLNG) Total Revenue
(LNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GLNG vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Golar LNG Limited and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
49.6%
20.0%
(GLNG) Gross Margin
(LNG) Gross Margin
GLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Golar LNG Limited reported a gross profit of 32.70M and revenue of 65.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.6%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.09B and revenue of 5.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

GLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Golar LNG Limited reported an operating income of 8.32M and revenue of 65.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 961.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

GLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Golar LNG Limited reported a net income of 3.35M and revenue of 65.92M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 353.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.