GLNG vs. EQT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GLNG (Golar LNG Limited) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — GLNG in Oil & Gas Midstream, EQT in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 10 years, GLNG returned 14.07%/yr vs 4.06%/yr for EQT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GLNG vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLNG achieves a 39.82% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's 2.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GLNG has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 14.07%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.06% annualized return.

GLNG

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -7.09%
• YTD: 39.82%
• 6M: 39.26%
• 1Y: 27.06%
• 3Y*: 38.12%
• 5Y*: 34.76%
• 10Y*: 14.07%

EQT

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -6.52%
• YTD: 2.59%
• 6M: -6.16%
• 1Y: -2.36%
• 3Y*: 16.00%
• 5Y*: 22.28%
• 10Y*: 4.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLNG vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLNG Golar LNG Limited	39.82%	-9.74%	90.78%	4.39%	83.94%	28.53%	-32.21%	-33.64%	-25.94%	31.03%
EQT EQT Corporation	2.59%	17.64%	21.41%	16.20%	57.64%	71.60%	17.27%	-41.82%	-38.82%	-12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GLNG and EQT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2003	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between GLNG and EQT has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap GLNG : $6.38B EQT : $34.18B
EPS GLNG : $1.31 EQT : $5.40
PE Ratio GLNG : 39.25 EQT : 10.12
PEG Ratio GLNG : 1.26 EQT : 0.08
PS Ratio GLNG : 11.81 EQT : 3.38
PB Ratio GLNG : 3.34 EQT : 1.36
Total Revenue (TTM) GLNG : $468.57M EQT : $10.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) GLNG : $245.50M EQT : $6.43B
EBITDA (TTM) GLNG : $256.69M EQT : $7.48B

Return for Risk

GLNG vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLNG

GLNG Risk / Return Rank: 65
GLNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GLNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
GLNG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
GLNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
GLNG Martin Ratio Rank: 65

EQT

EQT Risk / Return Rank: 36
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLNG vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLNG	EQT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	-0.07	+1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	0.12	+1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.02	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	0.02	+1.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.88	0.03	+2.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLNG vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLNG and EQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLNG	EQT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	-0.07	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.52	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	0.08	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.30	-0.10

Drawdowns

GLNG vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNG drawdown since its inception was -92.81%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNG and EQT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLNG	EQT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.81%	-91.51%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.95%	-19.28%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.41%	-31.62%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.35%	-42.56%	+9.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.29%	-88.28%	+1.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.02%	-19.28%	+8.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.80%	-23.34%	-20.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.96%	10.81%	-0.85%

Volatility

GLNG vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 7.75%. This indicates that GLNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLNG	EQT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.70%	7.75%	+1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.54%	21.76%	-0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.13%	32.65%	-3.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.31%	42.80%	-3.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.57%	48.93%	+4.64%

Dividends

GLNG vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

GLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than EQT's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQT EQT Corporation	1.19%	1.19%	1.37%	1.57%	1.63%	0.00%	0.24%	1.10%	0.42%	0.21%	0.18%	0.23%
GLNG Golar LNG Limited	1.94%	2.69%	2.36%	3.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.11%	1.72%	0.67%	0.87%	11.40%

Financials

GLNG vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Golar LNG Limited and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported a gross profit of 82.52M and revenue of 137.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.0%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

GLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported an operating income of 67.16M and revenue of 137.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.8%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

GLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported a net income of 83.58M and revenue of 137.55M, resulting in a net margin of 60.8%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLNG and EQT in my portfolio?

GLNG and EQT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLNG or EQT?

GLNG has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to EQT (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLNG dropped -92.81% vs EQT's -91.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.