GLNG vs. EQT
Compare and contrast key facts about Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) and EQT Corporation (EQT).
Performance
GLNG vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLNG vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLNG Golar LNG Limited | 44.95% | -9.74% | 90.78% | 4.39% | 83.94% | 28.53% | -32.21% | -33.64% | -25.94% | 31.03% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 14.30% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Fundamentals
GLNG:
$5.44B
EQT:
$38.15B
GLNG:
$0.64
EQT:
$3.30
GLNG:
83.34
EQT:
18.53
GLNG:
2.68
EQT:
0.12
GLNG:
13.91
EQT:
4.37
GLNG:
2.95
EQT:
1.61
GLNG:
$393.52M
EQT:
$8.64B
GLNG:
$184.37M
EQT:
$8.42B
GLNG:
$201.12M
EQT:
$5.89B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLNG achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's 14.30% return. Over the past 10 years, GLNG has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 13.56%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.
GLNG
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 16.90%
- YTD
- 44.95%
- 6M
- 35.32%
- 1Y
- 48.25%
- 3Y*
- 40.09%
- 5Y*
- 40.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
EQT
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 14.30%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 14.72%
- 3Y*
- 26.02%
- 5Y*
- 28.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLNG vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
GLNG
EQT
GLNG vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLNG | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 0.41 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 0.76 | +1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 0.85 | +1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 1.68 | +2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLNG | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.41 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.64 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.13 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.31 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLNG and EQT is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLNG vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
GLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than EQT's 1.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLNG Golar LNG Limited | 1.86% | 2.69% | 2.36% | 3.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.11% | 1.72% | 0.67% | 0.87% | 11.40% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Drawdowns
GLNG vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLNG drawdown since its inception was -92.81%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNG and EQT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLNG | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.81% | -91.51% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.95% | -18.39% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.35% | -42.56% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.29% | -88.28% | +1.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.75% | -10.07% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -23.37% | -20.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.10% | 9.31% | +0.79% |
Volatility
GLNG vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 9.09%. This indicates that GLNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLNG | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.29% | 9.09% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.13% | 24.01% | -1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.91% | 36.12% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.89% | 43.81% | -3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.52% | 48.96% | +5.56% |
Financials
GLNG vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Golar LNG Limited and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities