GLNG vs. FLNG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) and FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG).

Performance

GLNG vs. FLNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) and FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLNG vs. FLNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLNG Golar LNG Limited	46.19%	-9.74%	90.78%	4.39%	83.94%	28.53%	-32.21%	-15.00%
FLNG FLEX LNG Ltd	22.42%	22.47%	-11.61%	-1.19%	56.32%	202.13%	-17.14%	-1.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GLNG : $5.48B FLNG : $1.61B
EPS GLNG : $0.64 FLNG : $1.38
PE Ratio GLNG : 84.05 FLNG : 21.48
PS Ratio GLNG : 14.03 FLNG : 4.62
PB Ratio GLNG : 2.98 FLNG : 2.23
Total Revenue (TTM) GLNG : $393.52M FLNG : $347.64M
Gross Profit (TTM) GLNG : $184.37M FLNG : $183.77M
EBITDA (TTM) GLNG : $201.12M FLNG : $244.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLNG achieves a 46.19% return, which is significantly higher than FLNG's 22.42% return.

GLNG

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 22.35%
• YTD: 46.19%
• 6M: 35.50%
• 1Y: 45.82%
• 3Y*: 40.49%
• 5Y*: 41.07%
• 10Y*: 13.65%

FLNG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 8.75%
• YTD: 22.42%
• 6M: 24.77%
• 1Y: 45.05%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: 42.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GLNG vs. FLNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLNG

GLNG Risk / Return Rank: 77
GLNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GLNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GLNG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GLNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GLNG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FLNG

FLNG Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FLNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FLNG Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FLNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FLNG Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLNG vs. FLNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) and FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLNG	FLNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.61	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.22	-0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	3.71	-1.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.55	10.47	-5.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLNG vs. FLNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FLNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLNG and FLNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLNG	FLNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	1.61	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	1.04	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.56	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between GLNG and FLNG is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GLNG vs. FLNG - Dividend Comparison

GLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than FLNG's 10.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLNG Golar LNG Limited	1.85%	2.69%	2.36%	3.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.11%	1.72%	0.67%	0.87%	11.40%
FLNG FLEX LNG Ltd	10.10%	12.02%	13.08%	11.61%	10.71%	7.88%	2.29%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GLNG vs. FLNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNG drawdown since its inception was -92.81%, which is greater than FLNG's maximum drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNG and FLNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLNG	FLNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.81%	-71.92%	-20.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.95%	-11.05%	-10.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.35%	-31.05%	-2.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.96%	-5.89%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.08%	-19.23%	-24.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.17%	4.29%	+5.88%

Volatility

GLNG vs. FLNG - Volatility Comparison

Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) at 10.99%. This indicates that GLNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLNG	FLNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.28%	10.99%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.11%	18.25%	+3.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.90%	28.14%	+8.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.94%	40.70%	-0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.53%	47.81%	+6.72%

Financials

GLNG vs. FLNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Golar LNG Limited and FLEX LNG Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported a gross profit of 68.50M and revenue of 132.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.6%.

FLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported a gross profit of 44.30M and revenue of 87.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.

GLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported an operating income of 60.22M and revenue of 132.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.3%.

FLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported an operating income of 42.62M and revenue of 87.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.7%.

GLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported a net income of 10.36M and revenue of 132.81M, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.

FLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported a net income of 21.55M and revenue of 87.54M, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.