GLNCY vs. IYH
GLNCY (Glencore PLC ADR) is a stock, while IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Over the past 10 years, GLNCY returned 15.69%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for IYH. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GLNCY vs. IYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLNCY achieves a 37.58% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's 5.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GLNCY has outperformed IYH with an annualized return of 15.69%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.
GLNCY
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- 9.26%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 37.58%
- 1Y
- 92.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.78%
IYH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GLNCY Glencore PLC ADR | $10.70M | $12.17M | $9.82M |
| $81.05M | $58.47M | $58.18M |
GLNCY vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLNCY Glencore PLC ADR | 37.58% | 28.74% | -25.38% | -1.13% | 40.92% | 66.50% | 1.46% | -10.33% | -27.77% | 56.55% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 5.42% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLNCY and IYH is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2011 | 0.27 |
The correlation between GLNCY and IYH shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLNCY vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank
GLNCY
IYH
GLNCY vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLNCY | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 2.22 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.23 | 5.25 | +8.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLNCY vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLNCY drawdown since its inception was -85.04%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNCY and IYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLNCY | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.04% | -43.12% | -41.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.15% | -10.64% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.44% | -17.91% | -35.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.06% | -17.91% | -36.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.10% | -28.40% | -47.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.48% | -2.92% | -7.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.12% | -8.92% | -23.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 4.50% | +2.01% |
Volatility
GLNCY vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison
Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) has a higher volatility of 10.32% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) at 5.17%. This indicates that GLNCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLNCY | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.32% | 5.17% | +5.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.54% | 12.02% | +13.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.23% | 15.61% | +18.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.76% | 15.23% | +20.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.46% | 16.82% | +21.64% |
Dividends
GLNCY vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison
GLNCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than IYH's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLNCY Glencore PLC ADR | 1.82% | 1.83% | 2.98% | 8.68% | 5.56% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 5.50% | 4.70% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 13.64% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.17% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLNCY and IYH have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLNCY has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to IYH (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLNCY dropped -85.04% vs IYH's -43.12%.
GLNCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLNCY and IYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer