GLMD vs. SIVR
GLMD (Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd.) is a stock, while SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Over the past 10 years, GLMD returned -51.09%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for SIVR. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GLMD vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLMD achieves a -22.05% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's -18.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GLMD has underperformed SIVR with an annualized return of -51.09%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.07% annualized return.
GLMD
- 1D
- -5.80%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- 6M
- -12.08%
- YTD
- -22.05%
- 1Y
- -62.26%
- 3Y*
- -64.06%
- 5Y*
- -74.01%
- 10Y*
- -51.09%
- ALL TIME*
- -49.89%
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- 6M
- -27.56%
- YTD
- -18.49%
- 1Y
- 56.49%
- 3Y*
- 34.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $233.84K | $502.38K | $414.00K | |
| $53.73M | $50.42M | $86.10M |
GLMD vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLMD Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. | -22.05% | -76.47% | -41.58% | -93.93% | -72.53% | -41.48% | -46.19% | -15.37% | -25.36% | 160.68% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -18.49% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLMD and SIVR is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2014 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLMD vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
GLMD
SIVR
GLMD vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLMD | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.21 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 1.09 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 2.06 | -3.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLMD vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLMD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SIVR's maximum drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLMD and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLMD | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -75.85% | -24.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.21% | -52.27% | -18.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.89% | -52.27% | -44.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.92% | -52.27% | -47.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | -52.27% | -47.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -50.28% | -49.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -47.84% | -28.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.76% | 27.46% | +22.30% |
Volatility
GLMD vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) has a higher volatility of 20.78% compared to abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) at 10.92%. This indicates that GLMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLMD | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.78% | 10.92% | +9.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.24% | 44.35% | +31.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.10% | 61.45% | +30.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 166.87% | 37.01% | +129.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 138.38% | 32.27% | +106.11% |
Dividends
GLMD vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLMD nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLMD and SIVR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLMD has higher volatility (20.78%) compared to SIVR (10.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLMD dropped -99.99% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLMD and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer