PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLMD vs. COPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLMD vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLMD achieves a -7.91% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 30.46% return. Over the past 10 years, GLMD has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of -50.21%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.40% annualized return.


GLMD

1D
-4.96%
1M
21.01%
YTD
-7.91%
6M
-27.93%
1Y
-52.34%
3Y*
-77.01%
5Y*
-73.13%
10Y*
-50.21%

COPX

1D
4.00%
1M
18.48%
YTD
30.46%
6M
48.27%
1Y
129.92%
3Y*
39.06%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
22.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLMD vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLMD
Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
-7.91%-76.47%-41.58%-93.93%-72.53%-41.48%-46.19%-15.37%-25.36%160.68%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
30.46%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GLMD and COPX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2014

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLMD vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLMD
GLMD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GLMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GLMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLMD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLMD vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLMDCOPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.61

3.17

-3.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.63

3.34

-3.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.44

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

4.84

-5.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.93

15.55

-16.48

GLMD vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLMD Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLMD and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLMDCOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

3.17

-3.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.58

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.37

0.63

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

0.20

-0.57

Drawdowns

GLMD vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLMD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than COPX's maximum drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLMD and COPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLMDCOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-83.16%

-16.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.62%

-27.82%

-51.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.16%

-39.72%

-59.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.93%

-42.12%

-57.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

-65.41%

-34.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-2.13%

-97.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.34%

-39.31%

-35.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.31%

8.65%

+46.66%

Volatility

GLMD vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) has a higher volatility of 25.26% compared to Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) at 15.20%. This indicates that GLMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLMDCOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.26%

15.20%

+10.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.71%

35.46%

+27.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.30%

41.25%

+45.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

166.32%

36.49%

+129.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

137.60%

35.53%

+102.07%

Dividends

GLMD vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

GLMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.05%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
GLMD
Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLMD and COPX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLMD has higher volatility (25.26%) compared to COPX (15.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLMD dropped -99.99% vs COPX's -83.16%.

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLMD and COPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer