PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLMD vs. COPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLMD vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLMD achieves a -23.78% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GLMD has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of -51.88%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.81% annualized return.


GLMD

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
-23.78%
6M
-35.00%
1Y
-67.31%
3Y*
-75.82%
5Y*
-74.72%
10Y*
-51.88%

COPX

1D
-6.37%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.01%
1Y
92.36%
3Y*
31.59%
5Y*
19.08%
10Y*
20.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLMD vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLMD
Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
-23.78%-76.47%-41.58%-93.93%-72.53%-41.48%-46.19%-15.37%-25.36%160.68%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
10.71%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GLMD and COPX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2014

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLMD vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLMD
GLMD Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GLMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GLMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLMD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLMD vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLMDCOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.32

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

3.34

-4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

10.16

-11.32

GLMD vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLMD Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLMD and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLMD vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLMD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than COPX's maximum drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLMD and COPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLMDCOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-83.16%

-16.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.86%

-27.82%

-52.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.84%

-39.72%

-59.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.92%

-42.12%

-57.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

-65.41%

-34.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-16.95%

-83.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.07%

-39.24%

-36.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

58.02%

9.12%

+48.90%

Volatility

GLMD vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) has a higher volatility of 49.40% compared to Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) at 19.05%. This indicates that GLMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLMDCOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.40%

19.05%

+30.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.20%

39.12%

+35.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.71%

44.42%

+49.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

166.70%

37.03%

+129.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

138.16%

35.74%

+102.42%

Dividends

GLMD vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

GLMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.42%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
GLMD
Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLMD and COPX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLMD has higher volatility (49.40%) compared to COPX (19.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLMD dropped -99.99% vs COPX's -83.16%.

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLMD and COPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer