PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GLIN vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GLIN vs. USO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GLIN (VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - GLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLIN returned 2.19%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for USO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLIN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.

Performance

GLIN vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLIN achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 98.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIN has underperformed USO with an annualized return of 2.19%, while USO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.80% annualized return.

GLIN

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
-2.85%
6M
-1.54%
1Y
-4.52%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
2.19%

USO

1D
1.31%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
98.48%
6M
95.54%
1Y
97.37%
3Y*
28.86%
5Y*
23.92%
10Y*
3.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLIN vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLIN
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF		-2.85%-5.47%15.64%36.13%-21.46%29.57%-0.29%-21.49%-37.41%66.53%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP		98.48%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GLIN and USO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2010

0.17

The correlation between GLIN and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF

United States Oil Fund LP

Often compared with GLIN:
GLIN vs. FLINGLIN vs. INDYGLIN vs. EPIGLIN vs. INCOGLIN vs. INDFGLIN vs. INDLGLIN vs. SMIN
Often compared with USO:
USO vs. XLEUSO vs. BNOUSO vs. UCOUSO vs. USLUSO vs. OILKUSO vs. DBOUSO vs. WTI

Return for Risk

GLIN vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GLIN
GLIN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
GLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLIN vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GLINUSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.26

2.22

-2.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.26

2.81

-3.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.37

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

5.12

-5.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.59

9.66

-10.25

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLIN vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLIN and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GLINUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

2.22

-2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.67

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.10

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

-0.18

+0.09

Drawdowns

GLIN vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLIN drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIN and USO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GLINUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.36%

-98.19%

+18.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.56%

-20.39%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.77%

-26.05%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.97%

-36.23%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.80%

-86.75%

+11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.78%

-85.39%

+40.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.97%

-75.30%

+24.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.27%

10.81%

-4.54%

Volatility

GLIN vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) is 6.82%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that GLIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GLINUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

15.03%

-8.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.20%

38.18%

-22.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.47%

44.26%

-26.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.17%

36.04%

-17.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.69%

39.00%

-15.31%

GLIN vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLIN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLIN vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIN
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF		0.87%0.84%3.58%0.96%1.70%0.00%0.24%1.42%0.12%0.10%1.39%3.11%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

GLIN and USO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to GLIN (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLIN dropped -79.36% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 10-year performance, USO leads with 3.80% vs 2.19% for GLIN. On fees, GLIN is cheaper at 0.82% per year. On volatility, GLIN has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USO has performed better with a 3.80% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLIN is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

GLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

GLIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for GLIN and 0.86% for USO.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLIN and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer