GLIFX vs. GLFOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX).
GLIFX is managed by Lazard. GLFOX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Dec 31, 2009.
Performance
GLIFX vs. GLFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLIFX vs. GLFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.94% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 6.93% | 23.53% | 6.43% | 10.59% | -1.59% | 19.67% | -4.71% | 21.95% | -4.06% | 20.44% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLIFX having a 6.94% return and GLFOX slightly lower at 6.93%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLIFX having a 9.98% annualized return and GLFOX not far behind at 9.76%.
GLIFX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.98%
GLFOX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 23.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLIFX vs. GLFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLIFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than GLFOX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLIFX vs. GLFOX — Risk / Return Rank
GLIFX
GLFOX
GLIFX vs. GLFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLIFX | GLFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | 2.24 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 2.85 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.75 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 11.29 | +0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLIFX | GLFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.24 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.74 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.83 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIFX and GLFOX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLIFX vs. GLFOX - Dividend Comparison
GLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than GLFOX's 6.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.31% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 6.12% | 6.03% | 4.00% | 2.69% | 14.50% | 6.02% | 2.39% | 4.20% | 13.99% | 6.82% | 2.07% | 11.01% |
Drawdowns
GLIFX vs. GLFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIFX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, roughly equal to the maximum GLFOX drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIFX and GLFOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIFX | GLFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -29.65% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -9.01% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.15% | -17.14% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.65% | -29.65% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -6.14% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -3.41% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.19% | 0.00% |
Volatility
GLIFX vs. GLFOX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLIFX | GLFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 4.78% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.40% | 7.44% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.73% | 10.78% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 10.72% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 13.27% | -0.02% |