GLFOX vs. UMNIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GLFOX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares) and UMNIX (Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio) are both mutual funds - GLFOX is a Global Equities fund managed by Lazard, while UMNIX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Lazard. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLFOX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for UMNIX.

Performance

GLFOX vs. UMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GLFOX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 8.78%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: 16.48%
• 3Y*: 14.60%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

UMNIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLFOX vs. UMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	8.78%	23.53%	6.43%	10.59%	-1.59%	19.67%	-4.71%	21.95%	-4.06%	20.44%
UMNIX Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio	0.22%	5.02%	3.88%	3.53%	-2.72%	-0.44%	2.47%	3.26%	1.09%	0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GLFOX and UMNIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2011	0.01

The correlation between GLFOX and UMNIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GLFOX vs. UMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLFOX

GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 31
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

UMNIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLFOX vs. UMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLFOX	UMNIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.72	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GLFOX	UMNIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.52%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLFOX	UMNIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.84%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.01%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.24%	—	—

GLFOX vs. UMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than UMNIX's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLFOX vs. UMNIX - Dividend Comparison

GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than UMNIX's 2.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	7.01%	6.03%	4.00%	2.69%	14.50%	6.02%	2.39%	4.20%	13.99%	6.82%	2.07%	11.01%
UMNIX Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio	2.96%	3.94%	3.48%	2.70%	1.30%	0.16%	1.22%	2.48%	2.00%	1.53%	1.30%	1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLFOX and UMNIX in my portfolio?

GLFOX and UMNIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.