PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLFOX vs. LEOOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLFOX vs. LEOOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Portfolio Open Shares (LEOOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLFOX achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly higher than LEOOX's 4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, GLFOX has outperformed LEOOX with an annualized return of 9.70%, while LEOOX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.04% annualized return.


GLFOX

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.14%
6M
3.72%
YTD
7.60%
1Y
14.26%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
9.70%
ALL TIME*
10.60%

LEOOX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.40%
6M
3.44%
YTD
4.97%
1Y
9.52%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
5.04%
ALL TIME*
4.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GLFOX vs. LEOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
7.60%23.53%6.43%10.59%-1.59%19.67%-4.71%21.95%-4.06%20.44%
LEOOX
Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Portfolio Open Shares
4.97%10.90%10.62%6.63%-7.89%6.79%9.60%7.20%-2.48%4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between GLFOX and LEOOX is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLFOX vs. LEOOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLFOX
GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LEOOX
LEOOX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LEOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LEOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLFOX vs. LEOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Portfolio Open Shares (LEOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLFOXLEOOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.80

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.44

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

32.76

-28.58

GLFOX vs. LEOOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the LEOOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLFOX and LEOOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLFOX vs. LEOOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, which is greater than LEOOX's maximum drawdown of -10.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and LEOOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLFOXLEOOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.65%

-10.94%

-18.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-3.97%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.01%

-3.97%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-10.75%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.65%

-10.94%

-18.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-0.10%

-5.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-1.98%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

0.30%

+3.03%

Volatility

GLFOX vs. LEOOX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Portfolio Open Shares (LEOOX) at 0.61%. This indicates that GLFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLFOXLEOOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

0.61%

+2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

6.49%

+2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

6.60%

+4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.01%

4.48%

+6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.19%

4.12%

+9.07%

GLFOX vs. LEOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than LEOOX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLFOX vs. LEOOX - Dividend Comparison

GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than LEOOX's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
7.09%6.03%4.00%2.69%14.50%6.02%2.39%4.20%13.99%6.82%2.07%11.01%
LEOOX
Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Portfolio Open Shares
0.64%0.67%4.98%1.40%11.52%3.80%6.05%1.00%2.33%9.59%1.17%9.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLFOX and LEOOX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLFOX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to LEOOX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLFOX dropped -29.65% vs LEOOX's -10.94%.

LEOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLFOX and LEOOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer