PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLFOX vs. LEAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLFOX vs. LEAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio (LEAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLFOX achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly lower than LEAIX's 32.01% return. Over the past 10 years, GLFOX has underperformed LEAIX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while LEAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.


GLFOX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
7.26%
6M
7.41%
1Y
15.22%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
10.01%

LEAIX

1D
0.98%
1M
9.95%
YTD
32.01%
6M
34.67%
1Y
60.91%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLFOX vs. LEAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
7.26%23.53%6.43%10.59%-1.59%19.67%-4.71%21.95%-4.06%20.44%
LEAIX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio
32.01%33.74%11.41%12.67%-21.01%0.96%17.39%20.44%-16.25%42.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GLFOX and LEAIX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between GLFOX and LEAIX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLFOX vs. LEAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLFOX
GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

LEAIX
LEAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LEAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LEAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLFOX vs. LEAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio (LEAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLFOXLEAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.67

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

4.64

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.74

18.18

-12.44

GLFOX vs. LEAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the LEAIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLFOX and LEAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLFOXLEAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

3.77

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.62

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.70

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.71

+0.12

Drawdowns

GLFOX vs. LEAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum LEAIX drawdown of -37.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and LEAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLFOXLEAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.65%

-37.24%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-13.29%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.07%

-16.21%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-36.30%

+19.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.65%

-37.24%

+7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

0.00%

-5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-11.52%

+8.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.39%

-0.72%

Volatility

GLFOX vs. LEAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) is 4.51%, while Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio (LEAIX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that GLFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLFOXLEAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

6.85%

-2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

13.72%

-4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

16.39%

-5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.00%

16.06%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.34%

17.49%

-4.15%

GLFOX vs. LEAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than LEAIX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLFOX vs. LEAIX - Dividend Comparison

GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than LEAIX's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
6.10%6.03%4.00%2.69%14.50%6.02%2.39%4.20%13.99%6.82%2.07%11.01%
LEAIX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio
1.44%1.90%1.52%1.93%3.42%8.01%0.84%1.92%2.43%1.15%1.62%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLFOX and LEAIX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEAIX has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to GLFOX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLFOX dropped -29.65% vs LEAIX's -37.24%.

LEAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.77 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLFOX and LEAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer