GLFOX vs. GLIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX).
GLFOX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Dec 31, 2009. GLIFX is managed by Lazard.
Performance
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 5.88% | 23.53% | 6.43% | 10.59% | -1.59% | 19.67% | -4.71% | 21.95% | -4.06% | 20.44% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 5.89% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLFOX having a 5.88% return and GLIFX slightly higher at 5.89%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLFOX having a 9.65% annualized return and GLIFX not far ahead at 9.87%.
GLFOX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- 5.88%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
GLIFX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLFOX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GLFOX
GLIFX
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLFOX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | 2.23 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.79 | 2.83 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 2.74 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 11.44 | -0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLFOX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.23 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 1.14 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.75 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.85 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLFOX and GLIFX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison
GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than GLIFX's 6.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 6.18% | 6.03% | 4.00% | 2.69% | 14.50% | 6.02% | 2.39% | 4.20% | 13.99% | 6.82% | 2.07% | 11.01% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.37% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
Drawdowns
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, roughly equal to the maximum GLIFX drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and GLIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLFOX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -29.65% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -9.00% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.14% | -17.15% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.65% | -29.65% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -7.05% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -3.35% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.16% | 0.00% |
Volatility
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) have volatilities of 4.59% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLFOX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 4.58% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.39% | 7.35% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.76% | 10.71% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 10.70% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 13.25% | +0.02% |