PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLFOX vs. GLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLFOX having a 7.60% return and GLIFX slightly higher at 7.74%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLFOX having a 9.70% annualized return and GLIFX not far ahead at 9.92%.


GLFOX

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.14%
6M
3.72%
YTD
7.60%
1Y
14.26%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
9.70%
ALL TIME*
10.60%

GLIFX

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.08%
6M
3.91%
YTD
7.74%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
9.92%
ALL TIME*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
7.60%23.53%6.43%10.59%-1.59%19.67%-4.71%21.95%-4.06%20.44%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.74%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GLFOX and GLIFX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

1.00

The correlation between GLFOX and GLIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLFOX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLFOX
GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLFOXGLIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.58

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

4.31

-0.13

GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLFOX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, roughly equal to the maximum GLIFX drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and GLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLFOXGLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.65%

-29.65%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-9.00%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.01%

-9.00%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-17.15%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.65%

-29.65%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-5.43%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-3.37%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

3.29%

+0.04%

Volatility

GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLFOXGLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.85%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

9.47%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

10.85%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.01%

11.00%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.19%

13.18%

+0.01%

GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, less than GLIFX's 7.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
7.09%6.03%4.00%2.69%14.50%6.02%2.39%4.20%13.99%6.82%2.07%11.01%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.29%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, GLFOX and GLIFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GLIFX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to GLFOX (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLFOX dropped -29.65% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

GLIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLFOX and GLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer