GLFOX vs. GLIFX
GLFOX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares) and GLIFX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares) are both Global Equities funds from Lazard. Over the past 10 years, GLFOX returned 10.06%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for GLIFX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GLFOX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GLIFX.
Performance
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLFOX achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than GLIFX's 7.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLFOX having a 10.06% annualized return and GLIFX not far ahead at 10.23%.
GLFOX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 15.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
GLIFX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 7.33%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 15.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 7.81% | 23.53% | 6.43% | 10.59% | -1.59% | 19.67% | -4.71% | 21.95% | -4.06% | 20.44% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 7.33% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLFOX and GLIFX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010 | 1.00 |
The correlation between GLFOX and GLIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLFOX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GLFOX
GLIFX
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLFOX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 1.46 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | 1.98 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.74 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 5.88 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLFOX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 1.46 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 1.03 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.77 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.84 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, roughly equal to the maximum GLIFX drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and GLIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLFOX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -29.65% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -9.00% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.07% | -10.02% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.14% | -17.15% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.65% | -29.65% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.36% | -5.79% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -3.36% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.66% | -0.02% |
Volatility
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) have volatilities of 4.50% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLFOX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 4.53% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 9.30% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.75% | 10.72% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.00% | 10.99% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.34% | 13.33% | +0.01% |
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLFOX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison
GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, less than GLIFX's 6.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 6.07% | 6.03% | 4.00% | 2.69% | 14.50% | 6.02% | 2.39% | 4.20% | 13.99% | 6.82% | 2.07% | 11.01% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.29% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, GLFOX and GLIFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GLIFX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to GLFOX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLFOX dropped -29.65% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.
GLFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLFOX and GLIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer