PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLEIX vs. GSIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLEIX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLEIX achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's 6.30% return.


GLEIX

1D
0.45%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
21.54%
6M
22.70%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
31.90%
5Y*
23.25%
10Y*

GSIFX

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.71%
YTD
6.30%
6M
8.80%
1Y
12.85%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLEIX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
21.54%5.30%58.18%15.08%18.96%38.31%-17.46%16.95%-15.17%6.98%
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
6.30%25.51%0.33%15.44%-17.69%16.23%22.89%27.68%-14.85%4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GLEIX and GSIFX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017

0.45

The correlation between GLEIX and GSIFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLEIX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLEIX
GLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIFX
GSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLEIX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLEIXGSIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

0.90

+0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

1.34

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

1.20

+2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.03

4.58

+4.46

GLEIX vs. GSIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the GSIFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLEIX and GSIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLEIXGSIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.90

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.36

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.32

+0.27

Drawdowns

GLEIX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLEIX drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, roughly equal to the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLEIX and GSIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLEIXGSIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-59.25%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-12.15%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.07%

-13.83%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.89%

-31.94%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.29%

-0.64%

-5.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-15.23%

+6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

3.18%

-0.35%

Volatility

GLEIX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) at 4.92%. This indicates that GLEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLEIXGSIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

4.92%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

12.42%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

15.48%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.65%

16.92%

+3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.47%

17.40%

+8.07%

GLEIX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLEIX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLEIX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison

GLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.23%, more than GSIFX's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
8.23%10.00%25.43%10.22%4.70%8.41%4.17%4.83%3.54%0.68%0.00%0.00%
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
2.05%2.18%2.30%1.37%0.82%6.29%0.00%1.67%1.45%1.25%2.79%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLEIX and GSIFX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLEIX has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to GSIFX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLEIX dropped -59.27% vs GSIFX's -59.25%.

GLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLEIX and GSIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer