GLDYX vs. TNSHX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX).
GLDYX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 27, 2001. TNSHX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Aug 7, 2015.
Performance
GLDYX vs. TNSHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLDYX vs. TNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDYX GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund | 0.09% | 5.66% | 4.81% | 5.09% | -4.42% | -0.47% | 3.39% | 4.00% | 1.83% | 1.69% |
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | -0.07% | 5.31% | 4.03% | 4.05% | -3.96% | -0.57% | 3.26% | 4.05% | 1.31% | 0.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDYX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than TNSHX's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDYX has outperformed TNSHX with an annualized return of 2.27%, while TNSHX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.78% annualized return.
GLDYX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
TNSHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDYX vs. TNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDYX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than TNSHX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLDYX vs. TNSHX — Risk / Return Rank
GLDYX
TNSHX
GLDYX vs. TNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDYX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 1.83 | +1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.57 | 3.29 | +1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.45 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 3.67 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.82 | 13.23 | +4.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDYX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 1.83 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 0.78 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.47 | 0.99 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.03 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDYX and TNSHX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GLDYX vs. TNSHX - Dividend Comparison
GLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than TNSHX's 3.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDYX GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund | 4.11% | 4.32% | 4.31% | 3.36% | 1.72% | 1.02% | 1.70% | 2.49% | 2.87% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.03% |
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 3.82% | 4.22% | 3.94% | 2.68% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.81% | 2.45% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLDYX vs. TNSHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDYX drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, which is greater than TNSHX's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDYX and TNSHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDYX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.73% | -5.99% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.04% | -1.13% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.68% | -5.99% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.68% | -5.99% | -0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.82% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -0.90% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.31% | -0.08% |
Volatility
GLDYX vs. TNSHX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) at 0.52%. This indicates that GLDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLDYX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.52% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.93% | 1.23% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44% | 1.99% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.81% | 2.22% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.55% | 1.80% | -0.25% |