GLDU.TO vs. AGQ
Compare and contrast key facts about BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ).
GLDU.TO and AGQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDU.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008. AGQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Silver (200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. Both GLDU.TO and AGQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLDU.TO vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLDU.TO vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDU.TO BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF | 9.50% | 128.66% | 42.19% | 13.27% | -9.80% | -14.02% | 35.05% | 29.13% | -10.69% | 19.42% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -21.91% | 339.58% | 34.57% | -16.96% | -1.32% | -32.87% | 59.28% | 14.12% | -15.49% | -1.23% |
Different Trading Currencies
GLDU.TO is traded in CAD, while AGQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDU.TO achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -21.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDU.TO has outperformed AGQ with an annualized return of 17.13%, while AGQ has yielded a comparatively lower 15.07% annualized return.
GLDU.TO
- 1D
- 7.51%
- 1M
- -22.65%
- YTD
- 9.50%
- 6M
- 30.74%
- 1Y
- 82.43%
- 3Y*
- 52.61%
- 5Y*
- 31.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.13%
AGQ
- 1D
- 14.97%
- 1M
- -36.98%
- YTD
- -21.91%
- 6M
- 56.61%
- 1Y
- 150.28%
- 3Y*
- 57.91%
- 5Y*
- 25.34%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDU.TO vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLDU.TO vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
GLDU.TO
AGQ
GLDU.TO vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDU.TO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 1.30 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 1.94 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.00 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 5.39 | +2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDU.TO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.30 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.36 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.24 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.06 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDU.TO and AGQ is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLDU.TO vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDU.TO nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLDU.TO vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.99%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -97.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDU.TO and AGQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDU.TO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.99% | -98.16% | +20.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.13% | -76.21% | +38.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.18% | -76.21% | +35.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.01% | -76.25% | +27.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.76% | -83.64% | +54.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.03% | -79.82% | +30.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.33% | 27.99% | -16.66% |
Volatility
GLDU.TO vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) is 21.95%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 37.97%. This indicates that GLDU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLDU.TO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.95% | 37.97% | -16.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.49% | 131.03% | -82.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.12% | 116.62% | -61.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.85% | 70.95% | -35.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.39% | 62.68% | -30.29% |