GLDN vs. OUNZ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GLDN (Nicholas Gold Income ETF) and OUNZ (VanEck Merk Gold ETF) are both Gold funds. GLDN is actively managed, while OUNZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLDN charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OUNZ.

Performance

GLDN vs. OUNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GLDN

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -14.34%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OUNZ

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -8.44%
• YTD: -5.57%
• 6M: -10.22%
• 1Y: 22.02%
• 3Y*: 28.34%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDN vs. OUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF	-25.75%
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold ETF	-16.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDN and OUNZ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026	0.89

Return for Risk

GLDN vs. OUNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OUNZ

OUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
OUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
OUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
OUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
OUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
OUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDN vs. OUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLDN	OUNZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.80	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.16	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.85	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.34	—

Drawdowns

GLDN vs. OUNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDN drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, which is greater than OUNZ's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDN and OUNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDN	OUNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.32%	-26.09%	-7.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.09%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.09%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.40%	-24.51%	-7.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.43%	-7.64%	-9.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLDN	OUNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.22%	27.51%	+15.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.22%	18.21%	+25.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.22%	16.08%	+27.14%

GLDN vs. OUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDN has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than OUNZ's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLDN vs. OUNZ - Dividend Comparison

GLDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, while OUNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF	5.69%
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLDN and OUNZ in my portfolio?

GLDN and OUNZ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLDN or OUNZ?

On fees, OUNZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLDN or OUNZ?

OUNZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for GLDN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLDN or OUNZ?

GLDN has the higher dividend yield at 5.69%, compared with 0.00% for OUNZ.

What is the main difference between GLDN and OUNZ?

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for GLDN and 0.25% for OUNZ.