PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDM vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDM vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.83% return.


GLDM

1D
-3.67%
1M
-8.00%
YTD
0.06%
6M
2.68%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*

XLE

1D
-1.84%
1M
1.18%
YTD
29.83%
6M
27.49%
1Y
45.41%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
20.01%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDM vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.06%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.83%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-21.84%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and XLE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.07

The correlation between GLDM and XLE shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLDM vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLDM
XLE

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GLDM
100.0%
XLE

-

Communication Services

GLDM

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLDM

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

GLDM

-

XLE

-

Energy

GLDM

-

XLE
100.0%

Financial Services

GLDM

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

GLDM

-

XLE

-

Industrials

GLDM

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

GLDM

-

XLE

-

Technology

GLDM

-

XLE

-

Utilities

GLDM

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDM vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDM vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDMXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.36

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.79

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

10.90

-7.26

GLDM vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDMXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.23

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.77

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.31

+0.68

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.63%

-71.26%

+49.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.00%

-12.05%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-20.14%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-26.04%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.00%

-7.82%

-12.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-17.98%

+11.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.86%

4.18%

+3.68%

Volatility

GLDM vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is 5.65%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that GLDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

7.29%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.31%

16.56%

+6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.65%

20.49%

+6.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.97%

26.02%

-8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

29.58%

-12.68%

GLDM vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLDM vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.59%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDM and XLE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to GLDM (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 20.01% vs 17.81% for GLDM. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 20.01% return vs 17.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

GLDM is categorized as Gold, while XLE is Energy Equities. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDM and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer