PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDM vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDM vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 8.48% return.


GLDM

1D
-3.67%
1M
-8.00%
YTD
0.06%
6M
2.68%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*

SPYM

1D
-2.58%
1M
0.51%
YTD
8.48%
6M
8.21%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
21.54%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDM vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.06%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.48%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and SPYM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.08

The correlation between GLDM and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLDM vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLDM
SPYM

Basic Materials

100.0%
1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

3.2%

Financial Services

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

38.5%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Basic Materials

GLDM
100.0%
SPYM
1.7%

Communication Services

GLDM

-

SPYM
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GLDM

-

SPYM
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

GLDM

-

SPYM
4.6%

Energy

GLDM

-

SPYM
3.2%

Financial Services

GLDM

-

SPYM
11.1%

Healthcare

GLDM

-

SPYM
8.4%

Industrials

GLDM

-

SPYM
7.6%

Real Estate

GLDM

-

SPYM
1.8%

Technology

GLDM

-

SPYM
38.5%

Utilities

GLDM

-

SPYM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDM vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDM vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDMSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.92

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

13.53

-9.90

GLDM vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDMSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.15

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.80

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.61

+0.38

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.63%

-54.46%

+32.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.00%

-8.90%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-18.72%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-24.48%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.00%

-2.90%

-17.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-7.15%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.86%

1.92%

+5.94%

Volatility

GLDM vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.73%. This indicates that GLDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

3.73%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.31%

9.30%

+14.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.65%

12.09%

+14.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.97%

16.83%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

18.02%

-1.12%

GLDM vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLDM vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDM and SPYM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to SPYM (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.81% vs 13.39% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.81% return vs 13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

GLDM is categorized as Gold, while SPYM is S&P 500. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDM and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer