PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDM vs. SIVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDM vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -18.67% return.


GLDM

1D
0.98%
1M
-10.71%
YTD
-6.69%
6M
-10.19%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
27.80%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*

SIVR

1D
1.08%
1M
-24.87%
YTD
-18.67%
6M
-19.68%
1Y
58.85%
3Y*
36.04%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
12.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDM vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-6.69%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-18.67%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and SIVR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.77

The correlation between GLDM and SIVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDM vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDM vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDMSIVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.16

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

2.64

-0.42

GLDM vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -26.11%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and SIVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMSIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.11%

-75.85%

+49.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.11%

-50.92%

+24.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.11%

-50.92%

+24.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-50.92%

+24.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.39%

-50.38%

+24.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-47.83%

+41.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.33%

22.34%

-13.01%

Volatility

GLDM vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is 8.68%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 15.49%. This indicates that GLDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMSIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

15.49%

-6.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.32%

59.60%

-35.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.50%

60.71%

-33.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

36.76%

-18.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

32.19%

-15.14%

GLDM vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDM vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLDM nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDM and SIVR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIVR has higher volatility (15.49%) compared to GLDM (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -26.11% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.62% vs 16.94% for SIVR. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 8.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.62% return vs 16.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.

GLDM and SIVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GLDM is categorized as Gold, while SIVR is Silver. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: State Street and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.30% for SIVR.

SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDM and SIVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer