GLDM vs. SIVR
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDM returned 18.49%/yr vs 21.00%/yr for SIVR. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLDM charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
GLDM vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLDM having a 3.00% return and SIVR slightly lower at 2.85%.
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 24.90%
- 1Y
- 110.95%
- 3Y*
- 45.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
GLDM vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 3.00% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 2.85% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and SIVR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between GLDM and SIVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
SIVR
GLDM vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDM | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 2.63 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | 5.67 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDM | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.90 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.58 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.32 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.63% | -75.85% | +54.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.14% | -42.42% | +23.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.14% | -42.42% | +23.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -42.42% | +21.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.65% | -37.25% | +19.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -47.85% | +41.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.69% | 19.64% | -11.95% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is 5.47%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that GLDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 16.28% | -10.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.99% | 58.30% | -35.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.39% | 58.84% | -32.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 36.17% | -18.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 31.87% | -15.02% |
GLDM vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDM vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDM nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and SIVR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to GLDM (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
On 5-year performance, SIVR leads with 21.00% vs 18.49% for GLDM. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
GLDM and SIVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GLDM is categorized as Gold, while SIVR is Silver. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: State Street and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.30% for SIVR.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer