PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDM vs. RGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDM vs. RGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly higher than RGLD's -6.93% return.


GLDM

1D
-3.67%
1M
-8.00%
YTD
0.06%
6M
2.68%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*

RGLD

1D
-6.40%
1M
-13.01%
YTD
-6.93%
6M
2.59%
1Y
13.07%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
13.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDM vs. RGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.06%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
-6.93%70.43%10.39%8.70%8.51%0.04%-12.13%44.27%-6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and RGLD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.64

The correlation between GLDM and RGLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDM vs. RGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

RGLD
RGLD Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
RGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDM vs. RGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDMRGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.09

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

0.41

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

1.05

+2.59

GLDM vs. RGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the RGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and RGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDMRGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.33

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.39

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.18

+0.81

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. RGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum RGLD drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and RGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMRGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.63%

-98.29%

+76.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.00%

-32.16%

+12.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-32.16%

+12.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-40.73%

+19.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.00%

-32.16%

+12.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-29.82%

+23.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.86%

12.58%

-4.72%

Volatility

GLDM vs. RGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is 5.65%, while Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) has a volatility of 11.88%. This indicates that GLDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMRGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

11.88%

-6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.31%

32.05%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.65%

39.24%

-12.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.97%

31.53%

-13.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

33.65%

-16.75%

Dividends

GLDM vs. RGLD - Dividend Comparison

GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
0.90%0.81%1.21%1.24%1.24%1.14%1.05%0.87%1.17%1.17%1.45%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDM and RGLD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGLD has higher volatility (11.88%) compared to GLDM (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs RGLD's -98.29%.

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDM and RGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer