GLDM vs. PGR
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while PGR (The Progressive Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GLDM returned 17.89%/yr vs 18.76%/yr for PGR. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GLDM vs. PGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly higher than PGR's -6.42% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.89%
- 10Y*
- —
PGR
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 6M
- -4.51%
- 1Y
- -23.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 23.25%
GLDM vs. PGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.30% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | -6.42% | -3.02% | 51.39% | 23.16% | 26.81% | 10.84% | 41.48% | 25.14% | 0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and PGR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. PGR — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
PGR
GLDM vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDM | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.84 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | -0.94 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | -1.43 | +5.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDM | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | -1.04 | +2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.77 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.58 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum PGR drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and PGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.63% | -71.06% | +49.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.00% | -25.27% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.00% | -30.35% | +10.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -30.35% | +9.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.80% | -26.74% | +6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -14.53% | +8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 18.79% | -10.83% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is 5.65%, while The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that GLDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 7.57% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.31% | 16.95% | +6.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 22.76% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 24.55% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 24.48% | -7.59% |
Dividends
GLDM vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison
GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 6.94% | 2.15% | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 6.23% | 2.68% | 3.89% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 2.50% | 2.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and PGR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGR has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to GLDM (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs PGR's -71.06%.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and PGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer