GLDM vs. DGZ
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and DGZ (DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while DGZ is a Inverse Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDM returned 17.62%/yr vs -9.47%/yr for DGZ. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. GLDM charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DGZ.
Performance
GLDM vs. DGZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than DGZ's 12.34% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -10.71%
- YTD
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -10.19%
- 1Y
- 20.64%
- 3Y*
- 27.80%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- —
DGZ
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 20.16%
- YTD
- 12.34%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- -7.39%
- 3Y*
- -14.47%
- 5Y*
- -9.47%
- 10Y*
- -7.18%
GLDM vs. DGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -6.69% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.75% |
DGZ DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes | 12.34% | -32.55% | -16.46% | -4.75% | 4.93% | 1.53% | -20.80% | -13.42% | 0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and DGZ is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018 | -0.65 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GLDM and DGZ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.65 to -0.39, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. DGZ — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
DGZ
GLDM vs. DGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDM | DGZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | -0.19 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.22 | -0.33 | +2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. DGZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -26.11%, smaller than the maximum DGZ drawdown of -86.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and DGZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | DGZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.11% | -86.32% | +60.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -38.32% | +12.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.11% | -59.54% | +33.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.11% | -61.54% | +35.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.39% | -80.76% | +55.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -57.81% | +51.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.33% | 22.28% | -12.95% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. DGZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is 8.68%, while DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) has a volatility of 44.52%. This indicates that GLDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | DGZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.68% | 44.52% | -35.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.32% | 58.77% | -34.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.50% | 69.78% | -42.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 36.57% | -18.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 28.21% | -11.16% |
GLDM vs. DGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DGZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDM vs. DGZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDM nor DGZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and DGZ have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGZ has higher volatility (44.52%) compared to GLDM (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -26.11% vs DGZ's -86.32%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.62% vs -9.47% for DGZ. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 8.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.62% return vs -9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGZ.
GLDM and DGZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GLDM is categorized as Gold, while DGZ is Inverse Commodities. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while DGZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.75% for DGZ.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and DGZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer