PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDI vs. MVRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDI vs. MVRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDI achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly lower than MVRL's -2.82% return.


GLDI

1D
-1.62%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
-4.45%
6M
-5.42%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
7.83%

MVRL

1D
1.21%
1M
0.86%
YTD
-2.82%
6M
-2.49%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
-8.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDI vs. MVRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GLDI
UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033
-4.45%34.25%17.76%8.93%-1.11%-3.42%8.20%
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
-2.82%14.96%-3.45%12.30%-42.41%21.71%66.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDI and MVRL is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDI vs. MVRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDI
GLDI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GLDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDI Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MVRL
MVRL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MVRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVRL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MVRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVRL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDI vs. MVRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDIMVRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.09

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

0.56

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

1.45

+1.28

GLDI vs. MVRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDI Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the MVRL Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDI and MVRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDI vs. MVRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDI drawdown since its inception was -32.26%, smaller than the maximum MVRL drawdown of -60.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI and MVRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDIMVRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.26%

-60.25%

+27.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.14%

-20.93%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.14%

-32.20%

+18.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.14%

-59.63%

+45.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.28%

-38.42%

+25.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.99%

-31.84%

+17.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

8.09%

-3.79%

Volatility

GLDI vs. MVRL - Volatility Comparison

UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) have volatilities of 7.18% and 6.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDIMVRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

6.92%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.58%

20.60%

-6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

27.42%

-11.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.58%

36.55%

-24.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

37.59%

-26.07%

GLDI vs. MVRL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MVRL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDI vs. MVRL - Dividend Comparison

GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.67%, more than MVRL's 20.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDI
UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033
26.67%16.15%10.45%10.02%13.73%10.65%14.25%7.25%5.33%7.77%17.26%10.07%
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
20.90%19.15%19.27%18.69%25.21%12.33%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDI and MVRL have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDI has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to MVRL (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDI dropped -32.26% vs MVRL's -60.25%.

On 5-year performance, GLDI leads with 10.96% vs -8.77% for MVRL. On fees, GLDI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, MVRL has been the lower-risk option at 6.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDI has performed better with a 10.96% return vs -8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MVRL.

GLDI has the higher dividend yield at 26.67%, compared with 20.90% for MVRL.

GLDI is categorized as Gold, while MVRL is REIT. GLDI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index, while MVRL tracks MVIS US Mortgage REITs Index (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GLDI and 0.95% for MVRL.

GLDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDI and MVRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer