GLDI vs. FBGX
GLDI (UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033) and FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDI is a Gold fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index, while FBGX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDI charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for FBGX.
Performance
GLDI vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLDI
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -5.42%
- 1Y
- 11.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
FBGX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDI vs. FBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 | -4.45% | 34.25% | 17.76% | 8.93% | -1.11% | -3.42% | 23.50% | 14.40% | -0.54% | 8.94% |
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 35.73% | 83.74% | -56.41% | 57.04% | 65.79% | 75.84% | -16.58% | 64.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDI and FBGX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2014 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDI vs. FBGX — Risk / Return Rank
GLDI
FBGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLDI vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDI | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDI vs. FBGX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDI | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.28% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.99% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | — | — |
Volatility
GLDI vs. FBGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDI | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.58% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.52% | — | — |
GLDI vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDI vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison
GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.67%, while FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 | 26.67% | 16.15% | 10.45% | 10.02% | 13.73% | 10.65% | 14.25% | 7.25% | 5.33% | 7.77% | 17.26% | 10.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDI and FBGX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.
GLDI has the higher dividend yield at 26.67%, compared with 0.00% for FBGX.
GLDI is categorized as Gold, while FBGX is Leveraged Equities. GLDI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index, while FBGX tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GLDI and 1.29% for FBGX.
Find the right allocation for GLDI and FBGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer