GLD vs. VGT
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLD returned 12.15%/yr vs 25.19%/yr for VGT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
GLD vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 12.15%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.
GLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -10.21%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 47.99%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
GLD vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.47% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and VGT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004 | 0.05 |
The correlation between GLD and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLD vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLD
VGT
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GLD
VGT
Communication Services
GLD
-
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
GLD
-
VGT
Consumer Defensive
GLD
-
VGT
-
Energy
GLD
-
VGT
Financial Services
GLD
-
VGT
Healthcare
GLD
-
VGT
Industrials
GLD
-
VGT
Real Estate
GLD
-
VGT
-
Technology
GLD
-
VGT
Utilities
GLD
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
VGT
GLD vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLD | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.36 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 2.94 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | 9.11 | -6.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLD vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -54.63% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.46% | -16.40% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.46% | -27.23% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.46% | -35.07% | +10.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.46% | -35.07% | +10.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.05% | -7.18% | -14.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -7.95% | -8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.49% | 5.28% | +3.21% |
Volatility
GLD vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 7.79%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 10.00% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.10% | 18.00% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.37% | 22.00% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 25.40% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 24.72% | -8.64% |
GLD vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLD vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLD and VGT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to GLD (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 12.15% for GLD. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
GLD is categorized as Gold, while VGT is Technology Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLD and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer