PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. V
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. V - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Visa Inc. (V). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly higher than V's -7.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has underperformed V with an annualized return of 12.15%, while V has yielded a comparatively higher 15.98% annualized return.


GLD

1D
0.06%
1M
-7.37%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
12.15%

V

1D
1.05%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
-7.69%
6M
-6.93%
1Y
-7.91%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
15.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. V - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.47%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
V
Visa Inc.
-7.69%11.76%22.32%26.31%-3.40%-0.31%17.12%43.33%16.49%47.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and V is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2008

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. V — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

V
V Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
V Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
V Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
V Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Visa Inc. (V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.92

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

-0.73

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

-1.57

+4.38

GLD vs. V - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the V Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and V, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. V - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum V drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and V.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-51.90%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.46%

-17.18%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

-20.38%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-28.60%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

-36.36%

+11.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.05%

-12.96%

-9.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-8.26%

-7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.49%

10.73%

-2.24%

Volatility

GLD vs. V - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Visa Inc. (V) at 5.57%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

5.57%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.10%

17.57%

+6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.37%

22.35%

+5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

22.82%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

24.45%

-8.37%

Dividends

GLD vs. V - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while V's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
V
Visa Inc.
0.81%0.70%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and V have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to V (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs V's -51.90%.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and V

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer