PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -39.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 12.56%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.68% annualized return.


GLD

1D
0.26%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.24%
6M
3.07%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
12.56%

SQQQ

1D
-4.47%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
-39.28%
6M
-36.43%
1Y
-60.85%
3Y*
-54.68%
5Y*
-47.98%
10Y*
-55.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.24%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-39.28%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and SQQQ is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

-0.04

The correlation between GLD and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLD vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLD
SQQQ

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

103.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GLD
100.0%
SQQQ

-

Communication Services

GLD

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLD

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

GLD

-

SQQQ

-

Energy

GLD

-

SQQQ

-

Financial Services

GLD

-

SQQQ
103.4%

Healthcare

GLD

-

SQQQ

-

Industrials

GLD

-

SQQQ

-

Real Estate

GLD

-

SQQQ

-

Technology

GLD

-

SQQQ

-

Utilities

GLD

-

SQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.76

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

-0.93

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

-1.69

+5.47

GLD vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

-1.22

+2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

-0.72

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

-0.84

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

-0.87

+1.46

Drawdowns

GLD vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-100.00%

+54.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

-65.71%

+45.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-92.38%

+72.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

-97.23%

+76.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

-99.98%

+77.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-100.00%

+80.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-92.40%

+76.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.01%

35.98%

-27.97%

Volatility

GLD vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 5.68%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 19.65%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

19.65%

-13.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.47%

39.23%

-15.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.87%

50.16%

-23.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

66.95%

-48.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

66.30%

-50.31%

GLD vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
11.25%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (19.65%) compared to GLD (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 12.56% vs -55.68% for SQQQ. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 12.56% return vs -55.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.25%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.95% for SQQQ.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer