PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. IJS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. IJS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -6.25% return, which is significantly lower than IJS's 20.25% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has outperformed IJS with an annualized return of 11.05%, while IJS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.


GLD

1D
-1.49%
1M
-1.74%
6M
-16.50%
YTD
-6.25%
1Y
20.20%
3Y*
27.22%
5Y*
16.95%
10Y*
11.05%
ALL TIME*
10.28%

IJS

1D
0.09%
1M
0.38%
6M
12.92%
YTD
20.25%
1Y
39.43%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
10.17%
ALL TIME*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.38B$2.40B$2.72B
$28.19M$29.28M$50.29M

GLD vs. IJS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-6.25%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
20.25%6.54%7.33%14.68%-11.34%30.53%2.63%24.11%-12.86%11.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and IJS is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.06

The correlation between GLD and IJS shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. IJS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLD vs. IJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDIJSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.37

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

3.99

-3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

13.67

-11.81

GLD vs. IJS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the IJS Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and IJS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. IJS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum IJS drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and IJS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDIJSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-60.11%

+14.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.40%

-9.28%

-17.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.40%

-28.65%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-28.65%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.40%

-47.68%

+21.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.08%

-1.56%

-23.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-9.84%

-6.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.18%

2.70%

+9.48%

Volatility

GLD vs. IJS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) at 3.53%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDIJSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

3.53%

+2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.52%

11.13%

+12.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.13%

17.74%

+10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

21.71%

-3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

23.54%

-7.40%

GLD vs. IJS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IJS's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. IJS - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.32%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and IJS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to IJS (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs IJS's -60.11%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 11.05% vs 10.17% for IJS. On fees, IJS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 11.05% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while IJS is Small Cap Value Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.25% for IJS.

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and IJS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer