GLCC.TO vs. 2807.HK

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) and 2807.HK (Global X China Robotics and AI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while 2807.HK is a China Equities fund tracking the FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. GLCC.TO is actively managed, while 2807.HK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLCC.TO returned 19.65%/yr vs -3.07%/yr for 2807.HK. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLCC.TO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for 2807.HK.

Performance

GLCC.TO vs. 2807.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

GLCC.TO is traded in CAD, while 2807.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 2807.HK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLCC.TO achieves a -15.04% return, which is significantly lower than 2807.HK's -7.58% return.

GLCC.TO

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -12.69%
• 6M: -24.84%
• YTD: -15.04%
• 1Y: 37.69%
• 3Y*: 34.34%
• 5Y*: 19.65%
• 10Y*: 11.40%
• ALL TIME*: 0.85%

2807.HK

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: -19.65%
• 6M: -19.74%
• YTD: -7.58%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 3.61%
• 5Y*: -3.07%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLCC.TO vs. 2807.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	-15.04%	137.43%	20.18%	6.19%	-1.80%	-9.38%	-19.70%
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	-7.58%	17.62%	15.21%	-0.69%	-29.45%	10.67%	15.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GLCC.TO and 2807.HK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020	0.07

Return for Risk

GLCC.TO vs. 2807.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLCC.TO

GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 30
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

2807.HK

2807.HK Risk / Return Rank: 17
2807.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
2807.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
2807.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 17
2807.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
2807.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLCC.TO vs. 2807.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLCC.TO	2807.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.41	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	0.77	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.09	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	0.64	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.56	1.35	+1.21

GLCC.TO vs. 2807.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the 2807.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLCC.TO and 2807.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLCC.TO vs. 2807.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.37%, which is greater than 2807.HK's maximum drawdown of -49.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCC.TO and 2807.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLCC.TO	2807.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.37%	-49.03%	-32.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.74%	-20.53%	-14.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.74%	-33.14%	-1.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.60%	-45.30%	+7.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.65%	-20.87%	-13.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.99%	-23.80%	-29.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.75%	9.67%	+5.08%

Volatility

GLCC.TO vs. 2807.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) is 10.61%, while Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) has a volatility of 14.27%. This indicates that GLCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2807.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLCC.TO	2807.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.61%	14.27%	-3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.09%	24.81%	+12.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.63%	32.15%	+12.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.69%	32.71%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.29%	33.17%	-0.88%

GLCC.TO vs. 2807.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLCC.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than 2807.HK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLCC.TO vs. 2807.HK - Dividend Comparison

GLCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.89%, while 2807.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	10.89%	6.01%	10.30%	11.16%	10.08%	6.31%	6.47%	4.58%	5.62%	7.08%	8.75%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLCC.TO and 2807.HK in my portfolio?

GLCC.TO and 2807.HK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLCC.TO or 2807.HK?

On fees, 2807.HK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLCC.TO or 2807.HK?

2807.HK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLCC.TO.

What is the main difference between GLCC.TO and 2807.HK?

GLCC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while 2807.HK is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GLCC.TO and 0.68% for 2807.HK.