GLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO).

GLCC.TO and DXMO.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 11, 2011. DXMO.TO is an actively managed fund by Dynamic. It was launched on Jul 2, 2024.

Performance

GLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	5.98%	137.43%	2.88%
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF	3.52%	88.43%	-9.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLCC.TO achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than DXMO.TO's 3.52% return.

GLCC.TO

• 1D: 5.95%
• 1M: -18.48%
• YTD: 5.98%
• 6M: 20.90%
• 1Y: 86.11%
• 3Y*: 43.56%
• 5Y*: 25.34%
• 10Y*: 17.68%

DXMO.TO

• 1D: 6.73%
• 1M: -15.48%
• YTD: 3.52%
• 6M: 16.91%
• 1Y: 70.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLCC.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DXMO.TO's 0.74% expense ratio.

GLCC.TO

Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF

DXMO.TO

Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF

Return for Risk

GLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLCC.TO

GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 90
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

DXMO.TO

DXMO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 87
DXMO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DXMO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DXMO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DXMO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DXMO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLCC.TO	DXMO.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.95	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.33	+0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.35	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	2.71	+0.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.66	10.08	+1.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the DXMO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLCC.TO and DXMO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLCC.TO	DXMO.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	1.95	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	1.15	-1.15

Correlation

The correlation between GLCC.TO and DXMO.TO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Dividend Comparison

GLCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than DXMO.TO's 0.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	6.21%	6.01%	10.30%	11.16%	10.08%	6.31%	6.47%	4.58%	5.62%	7.09%	9.21%	11.63%
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF	0.17%	0.18%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than DXMO.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCC.TO and DXMO.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLCC.TO	DXMO.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.12%	-26.12%	-45.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.86%	-26.12%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.48%	-16.37%	-2.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.62%	-5.19%	-29.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.54%	7.03%	+0.51%

Volatility

GLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) have volatilities of 17.09% and 16.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLCC.TO	DXMO.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.09%	16.47%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.47%	30.33%	+4.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.29%	36.47%	+4.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.17%	34.02%	-2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.75%	34.02%	-2.27%