GKAT vs. YCS
GKAT (Scharf Global Opportunity ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - GKAT is a Global Equities fund managed by Scharf Investments, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. GKAT charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
GKAT vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GKAT achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.63% return.
GKAT
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 23.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
GKAT vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 5.08% | 5.93% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.63% | 16.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GKAT and YCS is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GKAT vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
GKAT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YCS
GKAT vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GKAT | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GKAT vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GKAT drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GKAT and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GKAT | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -49.56% | +39.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -0.14% | -5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -19.87% | +17.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
GKAT vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GKAT | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 16.93% | -4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.54% | 21.10% | -8.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.54% | 18.82% | -6.28% |
GKAT vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GKAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GKAT vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
GKAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 0.46% | 0.24% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GKAT and YCS have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GKAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GKAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
GKAT has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
GKAT is categorized as Global Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GKAT and 1.00% for YCS.
Find the right allocation for GKAT and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer