PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GKAT vs. WRND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GKAT vs. WRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GKAT achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than WRND's 16.52% return.


GKAT

1D
0.39%
1M
4.18%
YTD
10.13%
6M
13.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WRND

1D
0.38%
1M
4.43%
YTD
16.52%
6M
16.49%
1Y
39.03%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GKAT vs. WRND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GKAT
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
10.13%6.04%
WRND
IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
16.52%8.45%

Correlation

The correlation between GKAT and WRND is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GKAT vs. WRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GKAT

WRND
WRND Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRND Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRND Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GKAT vs. WRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GKAT vs. WRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GKATWRNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.86

0.81

+1.05

Drawdowns

GKAT vs. WRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GKAT drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum WRND drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GKAT and WRND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GKATWRNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.41%

-27.16%

+16.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.43%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-5.97%

+3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

Volatility

GKAT vs. WRND - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GKATWRNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

16.81%

-4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.95%

18.78%

-6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.95%

18.78%

-6.83%

GKAT vs. WRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

GKAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than WRND's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

GKAT vs. WRND - Dividend Comparison

GKAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than WRND's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GKAT
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
0.44%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WRND
IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
0.98%1.29%1.15%2.06%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GKAT and WRND have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WRND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WRND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GKAT.

WRND has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.44% for GKAT.

They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and IndexIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GKAT and 0.18% for WRND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GKAT and WRND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer