GKAT vs. OPER

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GKAT (Scharf Global Opportunity ETF) and OPER (ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GKAT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Scharf Investments, while OPER is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA U.S. Broad Market Index. GKAT is actively managed, while OPER is passively managed. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GKAT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for OPER.

Performance

GKAT vs. OPER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GKAT achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly higher than OPER's 2.16% return.

GKAT

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 2.09%
• 6M: 5.94%
• YTD: 8.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

OPER

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 1.86%
• YTD: 2.16%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: 4.71%
• 5Y*: 3.76%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF	$18.90K	$73.46K	$135.75K
OPER ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF	$882.36K	$708.61K	$932.74K

GKAT vs. OPER - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF	8.41%	5.93%
OPER ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF	2.16%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GKAT and OPER is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

GKAT vs. OPER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GKAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OPER

OPER Risk / Return Rank: 100
OPER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
OPER Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
OPER Omega Ratio Rank: 100
OPER Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
OPER Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GKAT vs. OPER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GKAT	OPER	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	14.80	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	42.55	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	12.88	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	59.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	505.14	—

Drawdowns

GKAT vs. OPER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GKAT drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, which is greater than OPER's maximum drawdown of -2.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GKAT and OPER.

Drawdown Indicators

	GKAT	OPER	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.41%	-2.33%	-8.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.07%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.11%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	0.00%	-2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-0.16%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GKAT	OPER	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.23%	0.27%	+11.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.23%	0.32%	+11.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.23%	1.22%	+11.01%

GKAT vs. OPER - Expense Ratio Comparison

GKAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than OPER's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

GKAT vs. OPER - Dividend Comparison

GKAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than OPER's 3.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF	0.65%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OPER ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF	3.98%	4.32%	5.21%	5.03%	1.71%	0.36%	0.64%	2.08%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GKAT and OPER in my portfolio?

GKAT and OPER have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GKAT or OPER?

On fees, OPER is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GKAT or OPER?

OPER is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GKAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GKAT or OPER?

OPER has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.65% for GKAT.

What is the main difference between GKAT and OPER?

GKAT is categorized as Global Equities, while OPER is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and ClearShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GKAT and 0.20% for OPER.