GKAT vs. OPER
GKAT (Scharf Global Opportunity ETF) and OPER (ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GKAT is a Global Equities fund managed by Scharf Investments, while OPER is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA U.S. Broad Market Index. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GKAT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for OPER.
Performance
GKAT vs. OPER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GKAT achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than OPER's 1.55% return.
GKAT
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OPER
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- —
GKAT vs. OPER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 9.70% | 6.04% |
OPER ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF | 1.55% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GKAT and OPER is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GKAT vs. OPER — Risk / Return Rank
GKAT
OPER
GKAT vs. OPER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GKAT | OPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 11.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 2.28 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
GKAT vs. OPER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GKAT drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, which is greater than OPER's maximum drawdown of -2.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GKAT and OPER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GKAT | OPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -2.33% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | 0.00% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -0.16% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
GKAT vs. OPER - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GKAT | OPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.97% | 0.26% | +11.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 0.32% | +11.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 1.23% | +10.74% |
GKAT vs. OPER - Expense Ratio Comparison
GKAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than OPER's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GKAT vs. OPER - Dividend Comparison
GKAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than OPER's 4.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 0.44% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OPER ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF | 4.09% | 4.32% | 5.21% | 5.03% | 1.71% | 0.36% | 0.64% | 2.08% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GKAT and OPER have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OPER is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OPER is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GKAT.
OPER has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.44% for GKAT.
GKAT is categorized as Global Equities, while OPER is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and ClearShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GKAT and 0.20% for OPER.
Find the right allocation for GKAT and OPER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer