PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GJUL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GJUL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July (GJUL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GJUL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GJUL
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July
-0.95%12.72%14.29%3.87%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-3.66%17.82%24.98%5.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJUL achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return.


GJUL

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
0.79%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.79%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GJUL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GJUL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJUL
GJUL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJUL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July (GJUL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GJULVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.01

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

1.53

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.55

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.91

7.31

+3.60

GJUL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJUL and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GJULVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.01

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.83

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between GJUL and VOO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GJUL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GJUL
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

GJUL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJUL drawdown since its inception was -10.68%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJUL and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GJULVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-33.99%

+23.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-11.98%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-5.55%

+3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.94%

-3.72%

+2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

2.55%

-1.28%

Volatility

GJUL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July (GJUL) is 2.87%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that GJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GJULVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

5.34%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

9.47%

-5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

18.11%

-8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.14%

16.82%

-8.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.14%

17.99%

-9.85%