GJUL vs. BFEB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GJUL (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July) and BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds. GJUL is actively managed, while BFEB is passively managed. Over the past year, GJUL returned 14.39% vs 19.04% for BFEB. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GJUL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BFEB.

Performance

GJUL vs. BFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July (GJUL) and Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJUL achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly lower than BFEB's 7.13% return.

GJUL

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 4.55%
• 1Y: 14.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFEB

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GJUL vs. BFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July	4.80%	12.72%	14.29%	4.05%
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February	7.13%	12.99%	17.58%	5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GJUL and BFEB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2023	0.92

The correlation between GJUL and BFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GJUL vs. BFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJUL

GJUL Risk / Return Rank: 89
GJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BFEB

BFEB Risk / Return Rank: 77
BFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJUL vs. BFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July (GJUL) and Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GJUL	BFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	2.30	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.03	3.25	+0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.44	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.80	2.98	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.54	14.92	+5.61

GJUL vs. BFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the BFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJUL and BFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GJUL vs. BFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJUL drawdown since its inception was -10.68%, smaller than the maximum BFEB drawdown of -27.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJUL and BFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GJUL	BFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.68%	-27.20%	+16.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.81%	-6.41%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-1.31%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-2.77%	+1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.70%	1.28%	-0.58%

Volatility

GJUL vs. BFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July (GJUL) is 0.82%, while Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that GJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GJUL	BFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	2.70%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.04%	6.75%	-2.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.39%	8.34%	-2.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.89%	11.43%	-3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.89%	14.25%	-6.36%

GJUL vs. BFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BFEB's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

GJUL vs. BFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither GJUL nor BFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GJUL and BFEB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, GJUL and BFEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GJUL or BFEB?

BFEB has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to GJUL (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GJUL dropped -10.68% vs BFEB's -27.20%.

Which ETF is better, GJUL or BFEB?

On 1-year performance, BFEB leads with 19.04% vs 14.39% for GJUL. On fees, BFEB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, GJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GJUL or BFEB?

Over the 1-year period, BFEB has performed better with a 19.04% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GJUL or BFEB?

BFEB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GJUL or BFEB?

GJUL and BFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GJUL and BFEB?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GJUL and 0.79% for BFEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.