PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GJRTX vs. GCGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GJRTX vs. GCGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJRTX achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than GCGIX's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GJRTX has underperformed GCGIX with an annualized return of 5.65%, while GCGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.09% annualized return.


GJRTX

1D
0.26%
1M
2.88%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.19%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
5.65%

GCGIX

1D
-0.31%
1M
6.79%
YTD
6.18%
6M
5.96%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
28.63%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
18.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GJRTX vs. GCGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GJRTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class
6.72%9.71%7.04%10.82%-6.26%6.45%3.61%10.91%-2.47%7.46%
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
6.18%15.51%53.44%37.56%-29.62%29.10%32.21%29.70%-4.58%29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GJRTX and GCGIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.81

The correlation between GJRTX and GCGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GJRTX vs. GCGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJRTX
GJRTX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GJRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GJRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GJRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GJRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GJRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GCGIX
GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJRTX vs. GCGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GJRTXGCGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.28

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

1.44

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

4.71

+10.80

GJRTX vs. GCGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the GCGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJRTX and GCGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GJRTXGCGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

1.59

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.76

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.84

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.46

+0.24

Drawdowns

GJRTX vs. GCGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJRTX drawdown since its inception was -13.23%, smaller than the maximum GCGIX drawdown of -65.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJRTX and GCGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GJRTXGCGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-65.78%

+52.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-17.25%

+12.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.48%

-25.10%

+16.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.82%

-32.57%

+21.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.23%

-32.94%

+19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-20.82%

+18.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

5.25%

-4.27%

Volatility

GJRTX vs. GCGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) is 1.51%, while Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that GJRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GJRTXGCGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

3.25%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

11.81%

-7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

15.66%

-9.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

22.23%

-15.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.48%

21.55%

-15.07%

GJRTX vs. GCGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJRTX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than GCGIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

GJRTX vs. GCGIX - Dividend Comparison

GJRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than GCGIX's 7.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
7.06%7.50%23.16%7.08%19.27%42.43%9.71%4.02%10.10%4.76%0.76%0.87%
GJRTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class
1.99%2.13%1.14%2.71%5.24%8.88%0.61%3.60%2.69%3.52%0.64%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


GJRTX and GCGIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCGIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to GJRTX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GJRTX dropped -13.23% vs GCGIX's -65.78%.

GJRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GJRTX and GCGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer