GJAN vs. RSBY

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GJAN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. GJAN is passively managed, while RSBY is actively managed. Over the past year, GJAN returned 14.41% vs 20.17% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. GJAN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

GJAN vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJAN achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 19.04% return.

GJAN

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.34%
• 6M: 5.03%
• 1Y: 14.41%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: 19.04%
• 6M: 15.93%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GJAN vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GJAN FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January	4.34%	10.71%	3.25%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	19.04%	-12.98%	-7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GJAN and RSBY is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024	-0.20

The correlation between GJAN and RSBY shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to -0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GJAN vs. RSBY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GJAN	RSBY
Technology	36.2%	53.7%
Financial Services	11.9%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.9%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.2%
Healthcare	8.4%	4.2%
Industrials	8.1%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	7.7%
Energy	3.5%	0.6%
Utilities	2.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.1%

Return for Risk

GJAN vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJAN

GJAN Risk / Return Rank: 81
GJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 84

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 51
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJAN vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GJAN	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	1.72	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	2.51	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.30	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	2.55	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.02	5.96	+10.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GJAN vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJAN and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GJAN	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	1.72	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.60	-0.19	+1.79

Drawdowns

GJAN vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJAN drawdown since its inception was -10.60%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJAN and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GJAN	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.60%	-23.32%	+12.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.71%	-7.95%	+3.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-6.04%	+5.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-13.76%	+12.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	3.40%	-2.50%

Volatility

GJAN vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) is 1.24%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that GJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GJAN	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	1.93%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.72%	8.51%	-3.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.84%	11.78%	-5.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.61%	13.53%	-5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.61%	13.53%	-5.92%

GJAN vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

GJAN vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

GJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GJAN FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.74%	2.07%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GJAN and RSBY in my portfolio?

GJAN and RSBY have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GJAN or RSBY?

RSBY has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to GJAN (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GJAN dropped -10.60% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, GJAN or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 20.17% vs 14.41% for GJAN. On fees, GJAN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GJAN or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 20.17% return vs 14.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GJAN or RSBY?

GJAN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GJAN or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for GJAN.

What is the main difference between GJAN and RSBY?

GJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GJAN and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.