GJAN vs. WEAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GJAN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January) and WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while WEAT is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GJAN returned 11.56%/yr vs -14.80%/yr for WEAT. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GJAN charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for WEAT.

Performance

GJAN vs. WEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJAN achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than WEAT's 11.97% return.

GJAN

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 4.35%
• 6M: 4.30%
• 1Y: 13.53%
• 3Y*: 11.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WEAT

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -8.92%
• YTD: 11.97%
• 6M: 9.23%
• 1Y: -1.93%
• 3Y*: -14.80%
• 5Y*: -6.80%
• 10Y*: -6.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GJAN vs. WEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GJAN FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January	4.35%	10.71%	12.09%	13.83%
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund	11.97%	-17.14%	-19.26%	-20.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GJAN and WEAT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023	-0.03

The correlation between GJAN and WEAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GJAN vs. WEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJAN

GJAN Risk / Return Rank: 79
GJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

WEAT

WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 8
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 8
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJAN vs. WEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GJAN	WEAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	-0.09	+2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	0.03	+3.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.00	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	-0.14	+3.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.83	-0.22	+15.05

GJAN vs. WEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the WEAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJAN and WEAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GJAN vs. WEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJAN drawdown since its inception was -10.60%, smaller than the maximum WEAT drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJAN and WEAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GJAN	WEAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.60%	-84.32%	+73.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.71%	-14.31%	+9.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.60%	-46.27%	+35.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-82.36%	+81.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-63.18%	+62.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	8.68%	-7.77%

Volatility

GJAN vs. WEAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) is 1.72%, while Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that GJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GJAN	WEAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.72%	4.83%	-3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.88%	18.17%	-13.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.89%	21.92%	-16.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.60%	30.43%	-22.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.60%	26.78%	-19.18%

GJAN vs. WEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WEAT's 1.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

GJAN vs. WEAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither GJAN nor WEAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GJAN and WEAT in my portfolio?

GJAN and WEAT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GJAN or WEAT?

WEAT has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to GJAN (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GJAN dropped -10.60% vs WEAT's -84.32%.

Which ETF is better, GJAN or WEAT?

On 3-year performance, GJAN leads with 11.56% vs -14.80% for WEAT. On fees, GJAN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GJAN or WEAT?

Over the 3-year period, GJAN has performed better with a 11.56% return vs -14.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GJAN or WEAT?

GJAN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GJAN or WEAT?

GJAN and WEAT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GJAN and WEAT?

GJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while WEAT is Agricultural Commodities. GJAN tracks S&P 500, while WEAT tracks Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GJAN and 1.91% for WEAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.