PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIUSX vs. GIFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIUSX vs. GIFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) and Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIUSX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than GIFIX's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GIUSX has underperformed GIFIX with an annualized return of 2.57%, while GIFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.35% annualized return.


GIUSX

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.62%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
2.57%

GIFIX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.69%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
4.97%
10Y*
4.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIUSX vs. GIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.16%7.86%2.91%7.07%-16.63%-0.90%14.63%4.47%1.20%6.61%
GIFIX
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund
1.04%4.13%7.22%13.03%-2.05%4.55%1.36%6.69%-0.14%3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GIUSX and GIFIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIUSX vs. GIFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIUSX
GIUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GIUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GIUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GIFIX
GIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIUSX vs. GIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) and Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIUSXGIFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.49

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

7.30

-2.48

GIUSX vs. GIFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the GIFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIUSX and GIFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIUSX vs. GIFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIUSX drawdown since its inception was -22.02%, which is greater than GIFIX's maximum drawdown of -19.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIUSX and GIFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIUSXGIFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.02%

-19.03%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-1.40%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-2.49%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.02%

-6.30%

-15.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.02%

-19.03%

-2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-0.09%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-0.75%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.47%

+0.56%

Volatility

GIUSX vs. GIFIX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) at 0.63%. This indicates that GIUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIUSXGIFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

0.63%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

1.63%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01%

2.37%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.91%

2.71%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.83%

3.36%

+1.47%

GIUSX vs. GIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIUSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GIFIX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIUSX vs. GIFIX - Dividend Comparison

GIUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, less than GIFIX's 7.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIFIX
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund
7.01%7.40%8.47%8.34%3.64%2.91%3.78%4.38%4.71%3.83%4.10%4.85%
GIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.81%4.75%4.68%4.39%2.71%3.36%4.36%2.42%2.76%3.47%3.85%4.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIUSX and GIFIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIUSX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to GIFIX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIUSX dropped -22.02% vs GIFIX's -19.03%.

GIFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIUSX and GIFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer